yea billions euro like you but lets not wonder when germany economy goes down
POLICY
-
Europe’s tech sovereignty: avoiding Latin American vassalization
By
–
then fix the system
or invest where it works or end up living in a europe that's like latin america
poor, few rich people, corruption and chinese/american vassalization -
Extracting Value Without Building: Economic Sustainability Concerns
By
–
isn't that just leeching the system? you enjoy living in a society but dont invest in building up the companies that make that society so premium this can be done for 1-2 generations and then it's over you got a few % better returns and the region around you is poor why
-
China’s Ambitious AI Strategy: Building a Parallel Tech Universe
By
–
Today's newsletter has been sent! For today's DeepDive, let's discuss how the World's Second Superpower Is Building a Parallel Tech Universe, where we unpack China's new Five-Year Plan and what it reveals about the most ambitious national AI strategy ever committed to paper, one that treats artificial intelligence not as a sector but as the operating system for an entire economy. Subscribe for free, link down below!
→ View original post on X — @kimmonismus, 2026-04-11 17:55 UTC
-
Five Pillars of Modern AI: Integration and Governance
By
–
This diagram nails it. Modern AI isn’t one thing — it’s 5 interacting pillars: GenAI • LLMs • RAG • Agents • Agentic systems The edge isn’t tools. It’s how you connect, control, and govern them. Miss one layer → fragile AI.
→ View original post on X — @ingliguori, 2026-04-11 17:25 UTC
-
Autocrats, Elections, and Technology: The Democratic Risk
By
–
Plenty of proof out there. Stop trying to keep people busy. If you dont want to believe evidence no point showing it to you again. Most autocrats get elected in the last decades.
-
Taiwan semiconductor cooperation amid US domestic policy challenges
By
–
Didn’t say Taiwan was the entire industry. But it’s definitely going to take the cooperation of Taiwan as is the case right now in Arizona. When you factor in the dysfunction of our domestic politics and the bureaucracy that comes with it and you add the reality of the lack of
-
OpenAI Sued by Penguin Random House Over ChatGPT Copyright Infringement
By
–
No f’ing way is that Fair Use. Kenshi (@kenshii_ai) 🚨OpenAI sued again! Penguin Random House has filed a major lawsuit against OpenAI in Munich. ChatGPT is now generating full stories and illustrations that are virtually indistinguishable from their popular childrens book series Coconut the Little Dragon. These legal battles keep piling up for one simple reason. OpenAI refuses to change how they build their models. This reckless pattern cannot continue. OpenAI is putting the entire future of AI at risk with their arrogance. They must fix this immediately or step aside. — https://nitter.net/kenshii_ai/status/2042852899676450947#m
→ View original post on X — @garymarcus, 2026-04-11 15:06 UTC
-
Boycott ChatGPT to Remove Altman from OpenAI Leadership
By
–
postscript: Gary Marcus (@GaryMarcus) Violence is not the answer. Boycott is the answer. This one’s easy. There is ample evidence that Altman is a dishonest person with inordinate power that we should not trust. But the way forward to is get the board to remove him, not to throw bombs at his house. Humanity must take the high road. The way to take the high road is to stop using his products, in protest of his implied openness to mass surveillance, his mass IP theft, and his company’s opposition to liability for their actions. When people stop using ChatGPT, Altman will have to go; it’s simple as that. Quite possibly the COO or CFO will step in, and we (and OpenAI itself) will all be better off. — https://nitter.net/GaryMarcus/status/2042973781304709251#m
→ View original post on X — @garymarcus, 2026-04-11 14:43 UTC
-
Boycott ChatGPT, not violence against Sam Altman
By
–
Violence is not the answer. Boycott is the answer. This one’s easy. There is ample evidence that Altman is a dishonest person with inordinate power that we should not trust. But the way forward to is get the board to remove him, not to throw bombs at his house. Humanity must take the high road. The way to take the high road is to stop using his products, in protest of his implied openness to mass surveillance, his mass IP theft, and his company’s opposition to liability for their actions. When people stop using ChatGPT, Altman will have to go; it’s simple as that. Quite possibly the COO or CFO will step in, and we (and OpenAI itself) will all be better off. Dean W. Ball (@deanwball) The guy who allegedly threw a Molotov cocktail through Sam Altman’s window seems to have been an adherent to pause/stop AI. I am entirely unsurprised and have been warning about this for a long time now. I am fine with people advocating for their preferred policies—if that includes a “pause” on AI development, so be it, even if I disagree strongly. But the obvious reality is that the rhetoric of this community—which to be *extremely clear*, is a very small and non-representative subset of the AI safety community—is closer to ecoterrorism than it is to a more typical activist policy effort. Every time I have written about existential risk in recent months, I have been called a mass murderer. People with ⏹️ and ⏸️ in their handles confidently tell me that I am murdering my own baby boy and every other child on the planet. Another prominent one of these people has called me a traitor to America. I only use my own examples because I know them; this rhetoric is representative of how this fringe of the AI safety world communicates with everyone. The rhetoric of the pause/stop crowd is out of control and it has gotten worse with time. This rhetoric always had the potential to cause violence and now this seems to be no longer hypothetical. — https://nitter.net/deanwball/status/2042782724440612952#m
→ View original post on X — @garymarcus, 2026-04-11 14:31 UTC