ICYMI: LangChain version 0.0.17 Refactored and improved documentation around prompts
LLMS
-
Transformers Outperform MLPs for Parsing Tasks
By
–
Transformers are better than MLPs far from the limit. And these papers are about something else. All it takes for my statement to be correct is that a transformer can learn to parse correctly in some cases.
-
Transformers Represent Grammar Better Than MLPs
By
–
No, transformers can represent grammar better than (say) MLPs, which is an advance. And they can learn it to a very limited degree, so what I said is accurate.
-
Encoding Grammar in Transformers: Gradient Descent Learning Challenges
By
–
You can encode a grammar into a transformer. The problem is gradient descent is not very good at learning it.
-
Intelligence: Similarity and Compositionality in Transformer Models
By
–
Intelligence is similarity + compositionality. Transformers' similarity is dot product of embeddings and their compositionality is attention, both still very primitive.
-
LLMs Face the Same Problem as NLP: Unclear Use Cases
By
–
The problem with LLMs is what it's always been with NLP: if people can't tell what they're good for and not, they'll wind up not using them for much.
-
LLMs Improving Faster Than Academic Publishing Quality
By
–
Considering the speed at which LLMs are getting better and Nature/Science worse, it won't be long before they cross.
-
Generalist Vision-Language Models Emerging as Industry Standard
By
–
Authors propose a generalist model capable of handling major large-scale vision and vision-language tasks with competitive performance. These types of #AI models will become the industry norm over next 1 to 3 years.
-
Large Language Models Should Master Multi-Digit Addition
By
–
Multi-digit addition should definitely be within reach for large language models at this point! https://t.co/snqwqxnVQ7
— Jason Wei (@_jasonwei) 18 novembre 2022Multi-digit addition should definitely be within reach for large language models at this point!