Build production-grade Agentic AI apps in pure Python! PydanticAI is a Python agent framework designed to simplify building production-grade Agentic applications. 100% Open Source
LLMS
-
Mistral DeepResearch 2507: Separate Model, Unknown Underlying
By
–
mistral-deepresearch-2507 is stated as a separate model. Hard to guess what’s underneath
-

Grok 4 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Claude 4 coding test
By
–
Grok 4 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Claude 4 Which one code apps better? I tested all 3 using same prompt. Here's the wild results: (Prompt + demos ↓)
-
Grok 4 MVP Prototype: No Hallucinations, Fast Edits
By
–
Used Grok 4 to prototype a mobile first MVP last weekend. No hallucinations, strong context retention, surprisingly fast on edits.
-
General capability creates unclear practical applications
By
–
problem w these things is that they are so generally capable its v unclear what you can actually do with them.
-
@testingcatalog — 2025-07-17
By
–
Nice! I also feel there is an opportunity to have something for local models. And obviously MCPs
-

Claude Desktop: The LLM OS Evolution with Cross-Platform Integrations
By
–
if you havent tried the Chrome + iMessage + Apple Notes + Linear + Gmail + GCal DXT integrations in Claude you are missing out the literal LLM OS evolution Smarter Siri is here; it's just called Claude Desktop
-
Google Launches Gemini 2.5 Pro and Deep Search Updates
By
–
Google dropped new updates for AI Mode in Search:
— The Rundown AI (@TheRundownAI) 17 juillet 2025
—Gemini 2.5 Pro support to help with complex questions
—Deep Search to save hours of research
—AI-powered calling to local businesses for pricing and availability details, currently in the U.S.pic.twitter.com/dcEQK9erGFGoogle dropped new updates for AI Mode in Search: —Gemini 2.5 Pro support to help with complex questions
—Deep Search to save hours of research
—AI-powered calling to local businesses for pricing and availability details, currently in the U.S. -
Training Models to Reconstruct Token Embeddings from Activations
By
–
i think i see your point. the embeddings we work with are the average of many tokens’ last-layer activations. so we can’t directly load them back in, need to train a model to do it
-
Chain of Thought Faithfulness and Reliability in AI Systems
By
–
2) I meant that there's no reason to consider a CoT "faithful". To be "faithful" one has to reliably and consistently attempt to provide correct information. One can be "sometimes factual" yet still "unfaithful".
