AI Dynamics

Global AI News Aggregator

About

GENERATIVE AI

  • AI-Generated Code Security Risks Exposed

    We already know that AI is getting better at writing code, but you might be shocked to learn how little of the code being written is actually secure! Uncover more with Dev Rishi (GM of AI @RubrikInc
    ) and Varun Badhwar (Founder of @EndorLabs
    ) https://
    go.rbrk.co/yz77cm

    → View original post on X — @predibase

  • Live Q&A with CTO on Hermes AI Tomorrow at 4pm

    Happening in 15 minutes! Come meet our CTO, @theemozilla Robert Scoble (@Scobleizer) You have heard of @openclaw competitor from @NousResearch called “Hermes.” Tomorrow at 4 pm we will get nerdy with @theemozilla. Live. I will get people up who asks questions here first. nitter.net/i/spaces/1DGleEpaXLrJL — https://nitter.net/Scobleizer/status/2041660785110479314#m

    → View original post on X — @scobleizer

  • Gemma 4 Runs Locally on MacBook Air with TurboQuant Compression

    OpenClaw running Gemma 4 locally at 25 tok/s on a MacBook Air with 16GB RAM. Atomic Chat's TurboQuant algorithm compresses the KV cache so aggressively that models which used to need 32GB+ now run smoothly on base configs. No cloud, no API costs. This is where local AI is heading! atomic.chat (@atomic_chat_hq) Run OpenClaw with Gemma 4 and Atomic Chat MacBook Air M4 · 16 GB RAM · 25 tok/s No cloud! No subscription fees! Open-source local model. Runs on your regular device — https://nitter.net/atomic_chat_hq/status/2041999885407252732#m

    → View original post on X — @kimmonismus

  • Do Claude web and Cursor support rendering these elements?

    Very cool. Do these render inside Claude web, Cursor, anywhere?

    → View original post on X — @randal_olson

  • Hermes CTO Space: Five Key Advantages Over OpenClaw

    Probably a good idea to join @Scobleizer space in about 45 minutes to hear from the Hermes CTO, I'd expect them to address the differences between Hermes and OpenClaw. But from my own perspective here are my top five observations: 1. Easier to setup initially 2. Easier to upgrade 3. Lower token usage over time due to less bloated system prompts and less "rework" on assigned tasks 4. Better skill system out of the box 5. Self improving without having to setup a ton of "pointers" like with OpenClaw The only thing I can say that's negative about Hermes is that it is still mostly for the bleeding edge tech crowd and non technical people will still struggle and still need to learn new concepts. But hey, that's why every Tom, Dick and Harry out there is building a custom agent platform that's GUI driven 100 percent…

    → View original post on X — @scobleizer

  • Meta’s New Model Criticized for Benchmark Optimization Over Real Utility

    The new model from Meta is already looking like a disappointment: overoptimized for public benchmark numbers at the detriment of everything else. Knowing how to evaluate models in a way that correlates with actual usefulness is a core competency for AI labs, and any new lab is unlikely to be successful without first figuring that out.

    → View original post on X — @fchollet, 2026-04-08 22:20 UTC

  • Running Quantized Local Models with Atomic Chat and OpenClaw

    Now you can use Atomic Chat to power OpenClaw with quantized local models! It takes several commands to set it up, and you will get a much higher context window. Mac Mini + Gemma 4 + OpenClaw combo

    → View original post on X — @testingcatalog

  • Namanopedia: AI-Generated Personal Wikipedia from Just a Name

    This is Namanopedia. I built lifewiki [mylife.wiki]. Paste a name, get their entire Wikipedia. An AI agent researches the web and compiles 40-50+ articles with infoboxes, wikilinks, citations, and categories. Takes about 3 minutes. Inspired by @karpathy's LLM Wiki pattern and @FarzaTV's Farzapedia. Except this one works for anyone, from just a name. mylife.wiki/naman-ambavi Andrej Karpathy (@karpathy) LLM Knowledge Bases Something I'm finding very useful recently: using LLMs to build personal knowledge bases for various topics of research interest. In this way, a large fraction of my recent token throughput is going less into manipulating code, and more into manipulating knowledge (stored as markdown and images). The latest LLMs are quite good at it. So: Data ingest: I index source documents (articles, papers, repos, datasets, images, etc.) into a raw/ directory, then I use an LLM to incrementally "compile" a wiki, which is just a collection of .md files in a directory structure. The wiki includes summaries of all the data in raw/, backlinks, and then it categorizes data into concepts, writes articles for them, and links them all. To convert web articles into .md files I like to use the Obsidian Web Clipper extension, and then I also use a hotkey to download all the related images to local so that my LLM can easily reference them. IDE: I use Obsidian as the IDE "frontend" where I can view the raw data, the the compiled wiki, and the derived visualizations. Important to note that the LLM writes and maintains all of the data of the wiki, I rarely touch it directly. I've played with a few Obsidian plugins to render and view data in other ways (e.g. Marp for slides). Q&A: Where things get interesting is that once your wiki is big enough (e.g. mine on some recent research is ~100 articles and ~400K words), you can ask your LLM agent all kinds of complex questions against the wiki, and it will go off, research the answers, etc. I thought I had to reach for fancy RAG, but the LLM has been pretty good about auto-maintaining index files and brief summaries of all the documents and it reads all the important related data fairly easily at this ~small scale. Output: Instead of getting answers in text/terminal, I like to have it render markdown files for me, or slide shows (Marp format), or matplotlib images, all of which I then view again in Obsidian. You can imagine many other visual output formats depending on the query. Often, I end up "filing" the outputs back into the wiki to enhance it for further queries. So my own explorations and queries always "add up" in the knowledge base. Linting: I've run some LLM "health checks" over the wiki to e.g. find inconsistent data, impute missing data (with web searchers), find interesting connections for new article candidates, etc., to incrementally clean up the wiki and enhance its overall data integrity. The LLMs are quite good at suggesting further questions to ask and look into. Extra tools: I find myself developing additional tools to process the data, e.g. I vibe coded a small and naive search engine over the wiki, which I both use directly (in a web ui), but more often I want to hand it off to an LLM via CLI as a tool for larger queries. Further explorations: As the repo grows, the natural desire is to also think about synthetic data generation + finetuning to have your LLM "know" the data in its weights instead of just context windows. TLDR: raw data from a given number of sources is collected, then compiled by an LLM into a .md wiki, then operated on by various CLIs by the LLM to do Q&A and to incrementally enhance the wiki, and all of it viewable in Obsidian. You rarely ever write or edit the wiki manually, it's the domain of the LLM. I think there is room here for an incredible new product instead of a hacky collection of scripts. — https://nitter.net/karpathy/status/2039805659525644595#m

    → View original post on X — @scobleizer

  • Muse Spark Review: Multimodal Queries, Stock Analysis, Coding

    a good writeup about Muse Spark on a few complex queries (multimodal, stock analysis, coding): riteshkhanna.com/blog/muse-s…

    → View original post on X — @scobleizer

  • Meta stock rises following Muse Spark model announcement
    Meta stock rises following Muse Spark model announcement

    Meta stock price went up by 6-8% after Muse Spark model announcement.

    → View original post on X — @testingcatalog