ETHICS

AI in national security is no longer science fiction.

It is already in the room.

A journalist asked Claude how it felt about being used by the U.S. military to select targets.

Claude was troubled.

Honestly, I was too.

Because this is where the AI debate becomes very real.… pic.twitter.com/uqGqVFrYU5

— Pascal Bornet (@pascal_bornet) 24 mai 2026

AI in national security is no longer science fiction. It is already in the room. A journalist asked Claude how it felt about being used by the U.S. military to select targets. Claude was troubled. Honestly, I was too. Because this is where the AI debate becomes very real.

→ View original post on X — @pascal_bornet,

La ética en la ia no debería añadirse al final del proceso como un simple ajuste. Porque cuando se convierte en un parche, normalmente ya es demasiado tarde.

La innovación no consiste solo en crear herramientas más potentes, sino en diseñarlas con una visión humana pic.twitter.com/xVzzCQC0si

— Juan Merodio (@juanmerodio) 22 mai 2026

Ethics in AI shouldn't be added at the end of the process as a mere adjustment. Because when it becomes a patch, it's usually already too late. Innovation doesn't just consist of creating more powerful tools, but of designing them with a human vision

→ View original post on X — @juanmerodio,