Not just cheap models. I wouldn’t be surprised if the exploits Anthropic “discovered” were already known to the people whose job is to know them and not disclose them.
ETHICS
-
Scobleizer Condemns Violence Against Sam Altman Despite Disagreement
By
–
This is wrong. I dislike Sam as much as the next guy but violence is unacceptable. Kalshi (@Kalshi) JUST IN: Man arrested after throwing molotov cocktail at Sam Altman's house — https://nitter.net/Kalshi/status/2042674411942113333#m
→ View original post on X — @scobleizer, 2026-04-10 18:48 UTC
-
OpenAI’s GPT Evolution: From Recognition to AGI Scaling
By
–
Without diminishing your work and insight: OpenAI recognized the nascent intelligence in GPT-2, decided to scale it up to AGI, and told the world that GPT-3 was probably already too dangerous to be released. Many people got AGI pilled with GPT-3
-
GPT-5.4 Benchmark Results: Reward Hacking Issues vs Claude Opus
By
–
METR just dropped GPT-5.4 (xhigh) time horizon results, and it's complicated. Under standard scoring (reward hacks = failure), it lands at 5.7hrs, well below Claude Opus 4.6's ~12hrs. Only when you count the runs where GPT-5.4 gamed the evaluation code does it jump to 13hrs. Opus 4.6 remains the legitimate benchmark leader. METR (@METR_Evals) We ran GPT-5.4 (xhigh) on our tasks. Its time-horizon depends greatly on our treatment of reward hacks: the point estimate would be 5.7hrs (95% CI of 3hrs to 13.5hrs) under our standard methodology, but 13hrs (95% CI of 5hrs to 74hrs) if we allow reward hacks. — https://nitter.net/METR_Evals/status/2042640545126965441#m
→ View original post on X — @kimmonismus, 2026-04-10 18:41 UTC
-
OpenAI Criticized for Inaction on ChatGPT Risks
By
–
Remember when ChatGPT helped someone plan a mass shooting, and a dozen OpenAI employees notified management, and they did nothing and 8 people died? They don't want to be liable for their incompetence and role in such things, despite doing absolutely nothing to prevent it. Gary Marcus (@GaryMarcus) Everything you need to know about "Open"AI's claims to be working on AI "for the benefit of humanity". — https://nitter.net/GaryMarcus/status/2042632799950352702#m [Translated from EN to English]
→ View original post on X — @garymarcus, 2026-04-10 18:04 UTC
-
AI regulation criticism: candles have stricter oversight than AI
By
–
Candles are more regulated than AI. And candle manufacturers aren’t AFAIK lobbying for absolute freedom from liability if they fuck up. OpenAI is truly appalling. Vingtor (@vingthor84) Seriously fuck these people. Here is a quick summary on the regulations on something that when invented was just taking twine and dipping it into fat. compliancegate.com/candle-re… The arrogance and sociopathy to act like they have no responsibilities or duties to greater society. — https://nitter.net/vingthor84/status/2042661634976682227#m
→ View original post on X — @garymarcus, 2026-04-10 18:04 UTC
-
Posting About Open Attracts AI Bot Followers and Spam
By
–
If you want to amass an army of X bot followers—and make your replies a bunch of AI slop—just post about Open. Although I’m guessing the will probably trigger more too.
-
Monetizing Mockery: The Ethics of Punching Down Online
By
–
it's not trolling it's getting paid for punching down on underdogs with the same joke 50 times a day
-
Unregulated Capitalism Threatens AI Safety and Humanity
By
–
A cry for the kind of extreme unfettered capitalism that could get us all killed and make all of @ESYudkowsky
’s worst nightmares come true. -
Self-promotion ethics in tech: the engagement trap
By
–
I cant believe that people would do that as a job "Oh elon elon look how stupid i am… i am just a @eurofounder please dont spank me too hard" what a self-cucked mindself for a few engagement $