Just saying, if I were a government that controlled the company that controlled TikTok, I would absolutely use it to exploit our free society with algorithms that fed into everyone’s confirmation bias, tribalism and need to be right in order to create more division and hate.
ETHICS
-
Agency Limitations for AI Risk Management and Natural Disasters
By
–
That's my point. Our agency is kimited for events like pandemics, earthquakes, tornadoes, meteor strikes, and other natural phenomena. The best we can do is take some preemptive defensive measures and hope for the best. But for AI and other manifestations of human activity, we
-
LLM Output Filters and Copyright Compliance Deception
By
–
If their argument was true, they wouldn't need output filters for Copyrighted materials, but LLMs and proprietary services do… and thus they are lying to cover their tracks.
-
Claude Copyright Lawsuit: Training Data and Protected Expressions
By
–
This is easily disproven. Claude can output Copyrighted expressions and is being sued for it. Therefore, training wasn't "non-expressive" as the model cannot distinguish what is protected and what is not — everything is ingested. It inherently falls under Copyright.
-
AI Systems Lack Innate Self-Interest Drive Unlike Humans
By
–
No, that's just false.
The desire to pursue self-interest, sometimes at the expense of other individuals, is hardwired into humans by evolution.
AI systems will not have this kind of drive unless we explicitly build it into them.
And we would be pretty stupid to do so. -
Designing AI Systems Subservient to Humans Always
By
–
Loke many other species, humans have evolved to be dominant at times and subservient at other times (because groups that rally behind leaders often have better chances of survival). We can design and build AI systems that are subservient to humans at all times, with zero desire
-
Historical gun control as model for AI regulation strategy
By
–
How about “Restrained and controlled”. One friend mentioned Japan’s control of guns from 1545-1879 as an example.
-
Good faith debate on AI dataset release ethics
By
–
How did those releasing the dataset engage in a good faith debate? Is it possible for such a debate to happen after the fact?
-
Copyright concerns and DSM compliance in AI development
By
–
You're willingly trying to destroy Copyright, it's fair to expect an adversarial response. The DSM exists, your interpretation of it is not grounded in reality.
-
Fair Use Rules in AI: Balanced Perspective on Rhetoric
By
–
What rethoric in particular? I have tried to refine my views to be some of the most balanced and reasonable of almost anyone in this debate. Fair Use serves a purpose and is fine to rely on if you follows its rules, and abide by those expectations.