Palantir vient de publier un manifeste en 22 points. En résumé : la Silicon Valley a une dette morale envers l’Amérique et doit participer à sa défense. Les armes IA seront construites de toute façon, autant que ce soit l’Occident. L’âge atomique est fini, la nouvelle dissuasion
ETHICS
-
Non-Totalitarian Palantir Alternative: Who’s Building It?
By
–
Startup idea: a non-totalitarian version of Palantir. Who’s building this?
-
Frankfurt School Philosophy and AI Ethics Demands Critique
By
–
Regardless of the demands in the manifesto, I find it very disconcerting that Peter Girnus and Alex Karp justify their demands with reference to the Frankfurt School (Adorno and Horkheimer), yet simultaneously establish a moral guilt in their first demand. Although Karp wrote
-
AI Revolution Claims: Hype or Genuine Paradigm Shift?
By
–
No! It really doesn't differ qualitatively from previous technological revolutions. That's the whole point. People like Dario present it as qualitatively different.
They are just deluded or biased by their vested interests in magnifying the impact of their work. -
Designers Still Critical for AI Output Validation
By
–
Knowing when the output is wrong is where designers still win for a good while I think!
-
Preventing AI Exploitation: US Geopolitical Position
By
–
You imply that i push for the exploitation. I argue for being in a position where exploitation isnt possible. Who is doing the same to the US?
-
Modern sacrifice: Rethinking ethics in technological society
By
–
We’ve never stopped practicing human sacrifice. We just don’t do it any more as a grisly public physical killing spectacle.
-
Evaluate Arguments Not Credentials in AI Debate
By
–
exactly. This my point. Amodei might even be wrong. But check his arguments! But don't discredit him for what he or she studied!
-
Expertise vs Argument Content: Reconsidering LeCun’s Expert-Only Approach
By
–
Lecun's argument doesn't make sense to me, and it never has. His point is that one should only listen to "experts" in specific disciplines who have studied in that field. I think that's wrong. Why? Arguments are examined based on the content of what is presented. One judges
-
Critique of AI Abstinence Analogy Using Chocolate Example
By
–
I did. But the example of using chocolate to practice abstinence from the allure of AI use is simply stupid and a ridiculous analogy.