But that just means “i assume i can choose for anyone who isnt rational”
ETHICS
-
Rational Agents and Ethical Dilemmas in Decision Making
By
–
Bc my most nicest friends/family members wont be rational and just optimize for themselves. They will go with the outcome where nobody dies
-
Protecting Non-Rational Beings: An AI Ethics Thought Experiment
By
–
Imho thats the thought experiment. I assume some people who arent rational will be worth protecting
-
Game Theory Strategy: Understanding Red Choice Decisions
By
–
Explain how picking red shows you understand game theory? And dont only include your outcome but also the outcome of your most beloved most naive most nicest family members
-
Framing shapes behavior prediction and decision outcomes
By
–
The framing is the question. Without the same framing you dont predict the same action by others
-
AI Safety Concerns: Protecting Vulnerable Populations from Risks
By
–
Or you dont want the nice naive people in your family and friendgroup to die
-
Complete Human Elimination in Autonomous Systems Safety Debate
By
–
I never said that. It isn’t about autopilot. It is about getting rid of the human completely. Humans cause accidents.
-
Half Your Family Will Die: AI Existential Risk Reality
By
–
But not everyone will. You accept that likely half your family will die. At least the nicest ones.
-
Growing Experience with AI Systems Will Increase Issues
By
–
Maybe not but you are gonna see a lot more as people get experience with these systems
-
AI-Generated Deepfakes Threaten Information Authenticity
By
–
Read carefully. Nowadays, it is no longer possible to ensure that what we hear, what we read, or what we see is reliable, authentic, and true. Degenerate AI produces sounds, texts, images, and videos of such hyper-realistic quality that human intelligence is systematically