What about your loved ones? Would you increase or decrease the likelyhood of several of them dying?
ETHICS
-
Decision-making ethics for loved ones survival optimization
By
–
The comparison isnt correct. Bc you also have to judge what your loved ones will do and how you max their survival
-
AI minmaxing creates lasting societal harms and isolation
By
–
And from that day on you permanently have to live in fear and alone Really bad minmaxing 😉
-
Human selfishness and social cooperation fundamental to society
By
–
If an absolutist max selfish outcome over children outcome behaviour would be true human societies wouldnt work.
-
Media propaganda and voting behavior in technological futures
By
–
It would only happen if theres a massive media or propaganda campaignbefore. Otherwise most people would vote blue to maximize the chance of their loved ones living
-
Maximizing loved ones survival versus own certainty
By
–
Bc the question is would you Max(survival(loved_ones), own) vs certainty(survival(own))
-
Phrasing Impact on Rational Decision-Making and Voting Behavior
By
–
The scenario includes the phrasing and the likely reaction of others to it. Different phrasing different outcome. People are phrased out of voting for their own rational best on a daily basis.
-
Irrational AI Actors: Children and Naive Users Risk
By
–
Yea in a nutshell Plus irrational actors (children, naive, toddlers, etc etc)
-
Survival, collaboration, and dominant gene pool evolution
By
–
Sorry. I know PLENTY of people who would choose maximization of likelihood of survival of all their loved ones and their own over likelyhood of their own. If you dont i am sorry. But its your choice to pick as you wish and many will. Dominant gene pool is collaboritive and
-
Voting Choices and Survival: Ethical Implications for Future Generations
By
–
You dont know what your others voted Whats your kid likely to vote? Would you increase their likelyhood of survival or only your own