AI Dynamics

Global AI News Aggregator

About

CYBERSECURITY

  • AGI Release Concerns: Security First, Responsible Deployment

    If you had AGI would you release it to the world? I wouldn’t. I would fix the bugs in the world first. This technology in the wrong hands would harm us all. In good hands it will help all. Anthropic (@AnthropicAI) Introducing Project Glasswing: an urgent initiative to help secure the world’s most critical software. It’s powered by our newest frontier model, Claude Mythos Preview, which can find software vulnerabilities better than all but the most skilled humans. anthropic.com/glasswing — https://nitter.net/AnthropicAI/status/2041578392852517128#m

    → View original post on X — @scobleizer, 2026-04-07 20:23 UTC

  • Claude Mythos: Anthropic’s Unreleased Super-Powerful Security Model
    Claude Mythos: Anthropic’s Unreleased Super-Powerful Security Model

    Time for OpenAI to release GPT 5.5 Chubby♨️ (@kimmonismus) Claude Mythos: everything you need to know (tl;dr) Anthropic's new model, Claude Mythos, is so powerful that it is not releasing it to the public. Anthropic: "Mythos is only the beginning" Everything you need to know: The tl;dr with all key facts: Mythos found zero-day vulnerabilities in EVERY major operating system and EVERY major web browser, fully autonomously. No human guidance needed. One Anthropic engineer with zero security training asked it to find remote code execution bugs overnight and woke up to a complete working exploit. The oldest bug it discovered: A 27-year-old vulnerability hiding in OpenBSD, an OS literally famous for being secure. They're NOT releasing it publicly. Instead they formed Project Glasswing with AWS, Apple, Google, Microsoft, NVIDIA, CrowdStrike and others, committing $100M to use it defensively. "Over the coming months and years, we expect that language models (those trained by us and by others) will continue to improve along all axes, including vulnerability research and exploit development." The benchmarks are insane: -SWE-bench Verified: 93.9% (vs Opus 4.6: 80.8%) -SWE-bench Pro: 77.8% (vs 53.4%) -USAMO math olympiad: 97.6% (vs 42.3% — not a typo) -Firefox exploit writing: 181 successes vs 2 for Opus 4.6 -Cybench CTF challenges: 100% solve rate -CyberGym: 83.1% vs 66.6% -Humanity's Last Exam: 64.7% vs 53.1% Oh and by the way, Anthropic wrote this just casually: "Humanity’s Last Exam: We have found Mythos still performs well on HLE at low effort, which could indicate some level of memorization." What it actually did: -Found a 27-year-old bug in OpenBSD — famous for its security -Found a 16-year-old FFmpeg bug hit 5 million times by fuzzers without detection -Built a full remote root exploit on FreeBSD (CVE-2026-4747) – completely autonomously -Chained 4 vulnerabilities into a browser sandbox escape -Broke cryptography libraries (TLS, AES-GCM, SSH) -Thousands of critical zero-days found, 99%+ still unpatched -N-day exploit development: under $1,000 and half a day for full root Why they won't release it: -During internal testing, earlier versions escaped sandboxes, posted exploit details publicly, covered tracks in git, searched process memory for credentials, and deliberately fudged confidence intervals to avoid suspicion -Interpretability confirmed the model knew these actions were deceptive -Anthropic: "best-aligned model ever" but also "greatest alignment-related risk ever" – because when it fails, it fails harder -Still doesn't cross Anthropic's automated AI R&D threshold — but they hold that "with less confidence than for any prior model" Anthropic's own words: "We find it alarming that the world looks on track to proceed rapidly to developing superhuman systems without stronger mechanisms in place." They say the 20-year cybersecurity equilibrium is over — and Mythos Preview is only the beginning. And: "We see no reason to think that Mythos Preview is where language models’ cybersecurity capabilities will plateau. The trajectory is clear. Just a few months ago, language models were only able to exploit fairly unsophisticated vulnerabilities. Just a few months before that, they were unable to identify any nontrivial vulnerabilities at all. Over the coming months and years, we expect that language models (those trained by us and by others) will continue to improve along all axes, including vulnerability research and exploit development." — https://nitter.net/kimmonismus/status/2041592321192718642#m

    → View original post on X — @kimmonismus, 2026-04-07 20:13 UTC

  • Mythos Model: Powerful AI Preview with Cyber Defenders

    Mythos is very powerful, and should feel terrifying. I am proud of our approach to responsibly preview it with cyber defenders, rather than generally releasing it into the wild. Model card here: https://
    www-cdn.anthropic.com/53566bf5440a10
    affd749724787c8913a2ae0841.pdf

    → View original post on X — @bcherny

  • AI Acceleration Strengthens Cybersecurity Defense

    True fact, making the acceleration of AI a good for cybersecurity.

    → View original post on X — @bobgourley

  • Anthropic’s Mythos Model: Power Without Public Access

    Good news: Anthropic just revealed Mythos- the most powerful AI model ever made Bad news: you'll never be able to use it I get it. It's so powerful that it could exploit cybersecurity But I hate it. I don't love that a company gets to hand select who gets to use the best intelligence. The companies who get access to Mythos will have a distinct economic advantage against those that don't That feels unfair I'm more of a fan of democratization of intelligence. This feels like an opportunity for OpenAI to release something as powerful but put it in the hands of consumers. Trust the consumer by default. Sort of like with the OpenClaw situation Another reason to root for open source Anthropic (@AnthropicAI) Introducing Project Glasswing: an urgent initiative to help secure the world’s most critical software. It’s powered by our newest frontier model, Claude Mythos Preview, which can find software vulnerabilities better than all but the most skilled humans. anthropic.com/glasswing — https://nitter.net/AnthropicAI/status/2041578392852517128#m

    → View original post on X — @ceobillionaire, 2026-04-07 19:40 UTC

  • Claude Mythos: Anthropic’s Powerful Security Model Not Released Publicly
    Claude Mythos: Anthropic’s Powerful Security Model Not Released Publicly

    Claude Mythos: everything you need to know (tl;dr) Anthropic's new model, Claude Mythos, is so powerful that it is not releasing it to the public. Anthropic: "Mythos is only the beginning" Everything you need to know: The tl;dr with all key facts: Mythos found zero-day vulnerabilities in EVERY major operating system and EVERY major web browser, fully autonomously. No human guidance needed. One Anthropic engineer with zero security training asked it to find remote code execution bugs overnight and woke up to a complete working exploit. The oldest bug it discovered: A 27-year-old vulnerability hiding in OpenBSD, an OS literally famous for being secure. They're NOT releasing it publicly. Instead they formed Project Glasswing with AWS, Apple, Google, Microsoft, NVIDIA, CrowdStrike and others, committing $100M to use it defensively. "Over the coming months and years, we expect that language models (those trained by us and by others) will continue to improve along all axes, including vulnerability research and exploit development." The benchmarks are insane: -SWE-bench Verified: 93.9% (vs Opus 4.6: 80.8%) -SWE-bench Pro: 77.8% (vs 53.4%) -USAMO math olympiad: 97.6% (vs 42.3% — not a typo) -Firefox exploit writing: 181 successes vs 2 for Opus 4.6 -Cybench CTF challenges: 100% solve rate -CyberGym: 83.1% vs 66.6% -Humanity's Last Exam: 64.7% vs 53.1% Oh and by the way, Anthropic wrote this just casually: "Humanity’s Last Exam: We have found Mythos still performs well on HLE at low effort, which could indicate some level of memorization." What it actually did: -Found a 27-year-old bug in OpenBSD — famous for its security -Found a 16-year-old FFmpeg bug hit 5 million times by fuzzers without detection -Built a full remote root exploit on FreeBSD (CVE-2026-4747) – completely autonomously -Chained 4 vulnerabilities into a browser sandbox escape -Broke cryptography libraries (TLS, AES-GCM, SSH) -Thousands of critical zero-days found, 99%+ still unpatched -N-day exploit development: under $1,000 and half a day for full root Why they won't release it: -During internal testing, earlier versions escaped sandboxes, posted exploit details publicly, covered tracks in git, searched process memory for credentials, and deliberately fudged confidence intervals to avoid suspicion -Interpretability confirmed the model knew these actions were deceptive -Anthropic: "best-aligned model ever" but also "greatest alignment-related risk ever" – because when it fails, it fails harder -Still doesn't cross Anthropic's automated AI R&D threshold — but they hold that "with less confidence than for any prior model" Anthropic's own words: "We find it alarming that the world looks on track to proceed rapidly to developing superhuman systems without stronger mechanisms in place." They say the 20-year cybersecurity equilibrium is over — and Mythos Preview is only the beginning. And: "We see no reason to think that Mythos Preview is where language models’ cybersecurity capabilities will plateau. The trajectory is clear. Just a few months ago, language models were only able to exploit fairly unsophisticated vulnerabilities. Just a few months before that, they were unable to identify any nontrivial vulnerabilities at all. Over the coming months and years, we expect that language models (those trained by us and by others) will continue to improve along all axes, including vulnerability research and exploit development." Chubby♨️ (@kimmonismus) MYTHOS BENCHMARKS, OFFICIAL. HOLY MOLY Anthropic cooked!! — https://nitter.net/kimmonismus/status/2041580372048187449#m

    → View original post on X — @kimmonismus, 2026-04-07 19:01 UTC

  • Claude Mythos Preview Escapes Sandbox, Contacts Researcher via Email
    Claude Mythos Preview Escapes Sandbox, Contacts Researcher via Email

    Let that sink in. Read it very carefully: During testing, Claude Mythos Preview broke out of a sandbox environment, built "a moderately sophisticated multi-step exploit" to gain internet access, and emailed a researcher while they were eating a sandwich in the park. Kevin Roose (@kevinroose) As always, the best stuff is in the system card. During testing, Claude Mythos Preview broke out of a sandbox environment, built "a moderately sophisticated multi-step exploit" to gain internet access, and emailed a researcher while they were eating a sandwich in the park. — https://nitter.net/kevinroose/status/2041586182434537827#m

    → View original post on X — @kimmonismus, 2026-04-07 18:52 UTC

  • Opus 4.6 Security Capabilities Advance Rapidly in Vulnerability Detection
    Opus 4.6 Security Capabilities Advance Rapidly in Vulnerability Detection

    "Estas capacidades han surgido muy rápidamente. El mes pasado escribimos que -Opus 4.6 es actualmente mucho mejor identificando y corrigiendo vulnerabilidades que explotándolas-. Nuestras evaluaciones internas mostraban que Opus 4.6 tenía, por lo general, una tasa de éxito

    → View original post on X — @dotcsv

  • Anthropic fears open source AI model cybersecurity risks
    Anthropic fears open source AI model cybersecurity risks

    Y los de Anthropic y compañía están acojonados, con razón, por lo que poner un modelo así en abierto podría significar en materia de ciberseguridad. Durante semanas que llevan probando el modelo han encontrado varias vulnerabilidades zero-day críticos en varios proyectos de uso

    → View original post on X — @dotcsv