We're not evaluating "models" (whatever that means), we're evaluating arbitrary AI systems. They can include whatever harnesses or tools they want. But they cannot have been handcrafted or trained for ARC-AGI-3 specifically, because then we wouldn't testing AGI, we would be
AGI
-
AI Testing Performance: Achieving Near-Perfect Scores
By
–
Having played all of these games, I feel strongly that I would have scored >95% in a real testing session. Even the #1 human tester replay tends to be very, very far from optimal, and we're using #2 as baseline, so it's easy to score 100% on an given environment. You don't need
-
AGI Must Build Its Own Harness for True Generality
By
–
AGI will make its own harness (or whatever else it needs to solve a new problem). As long as you need a human engineer to handcraft a task-specific harness/system for each new problem, AI isn't general. It's an automation tool to be wielded by software engineers. Harness-related
-
Governing the Agentic AI Ecosystem: Future of Autonomous Intelligence
By
–
The Era Of The 'Agentic' Ecosystem: How To Govern A World Run By #AI
by @gregoriopatino @Forbes Learn more: https://
bit.ly/4d4k68G #GenAI #ArtificialIntelligence #MachineLearning #ML -
New AGI Eval Focuses Research Efforts on Critical Gaps
By
–
If you care about the rate of AGI progress, you should be excited about a new eval that focuses research efforts by pointing out important gaps & providing a way to measure progress towards fixing them If instead you only care about having your preconceptions confirmed, too bad
-
ARC-AGI-3 Environments Mirror Scientific Method for Breakthrough AI
By
–
Many people expect that current AI is ready to cure cancer and do breakthrough new science. ARC-AGI-3 envs are like a microcosm of the scientific method: you must observe a tiny world, form a theory of how it works, test it, iterate until correct. Over the course of a few
-
AI Systems Fall Short of Human Job Performance Standards
By
–
Virtually every human job on earth has a higher bar. These are not very high expectations for AI systems that claim to be able to do everything humans can.
-
Defining ASI: Super Intelligence Beyond Human Performance
By
–
"2+ people can do it out of an unfiltered pool of 10 people that might well be a below-average sample" is not the sign of a insurmountable challenge. It's not certainly where I would set the bar for "super intelligence". ASI is when AI is better than *every single human* — for
-
Power Centralization in AI Attracts Those Seeking Control
By
–
Such a centralization of power inevitably attracts those that wish to yield it.
-
Government Surveillance Required to Pause Frontier AI Development
By
–
"pausing frontier AI development" is not an action, it's an outcome. A government must do a specific thing to make it happen. It would require, for instance, total gov surveillance of all computer use. It would plan the state in a uniquely powerful position