Keep in mind: ARC-AGI is *not* a final exam that you pass to claim AGI. Including ARC-AGI-3. The benchmarks target the residual gap between what's hard for AI and what's easy for humans. It's meant to be a tool to measure AGI progress and to drive researchers towards the most
AGI
-
Were ARC-AGI Tasks Dropped Because Models Already Solved Them?
By
–
Just wondering: were any ARC-AGI designs discarded because current models were already too good out of the box?
-
Critique of AI Safety Group’s Strategy Against AGI Risks
By
–
ninhuem: nada portuguesas: TU TENTO JA FRANCESINHAAAAA??????!!!!!!!!! PVVVV
-
Human-Level General Intelligence Requires Learning Efficiency Parity
By
–
Human-level general intelligence is achieved when an AI system can approach a new task and figure it out, without human intervention, *with the same learning efficiency as humans*. If every new task requires human intervention, it's not general. If every new task requires
-
ARC-AGI-3 Game Studio Launch with Exceptional Team
By
–
To ship ARC-AGI-3, we've set up an entire game studio. Exceptional crew — super proud of the team. They did an incredible job.
-
ARC-AGI-3 Leaderboard: Measuring True AI Intelligence Beyond Human Design
By
–
It is trivial to solve all public ARC-AGI-3 tasks if you have a human looking at them and designing a system to beat them (we have released a harness that uses human replay to score 100%). But our leaderboard is not about measuring how well human intelligence does on ARC-AGI-3,
-
AGI Benchmarks, SpaceX IPO, Meta’s Trillion Vision, Sora Shutdown
By
–
Benchmark's Future, ARC-AGI, SpaceX IPO, Epic Games Layoffs, Meta Aims for $9 Trillion, RIP Sora https://
x.com/i/broadcasts/1
rGmqoDVwbZGy
… -
ARC-AGI-3 Benchmarks Agent Performance Against Human Action Efficiency
By
–
ARC-AGI-3 scores agents on how close they are to human action efficiency. All ARC-AGI-3 environments were solved by at least 2 human testers out of 10 (most of the time it was 5+). We use the action count of the 2nd best tester (to avoid outlier performance) as our human
-
AGI Capability: Task Learning Without Human Intervention Required
By
–
Either you believe AGI is possible, in which case a real AGI will be able to look at ARC-AGI-3 and ace it, because regular humans can… …or you believe that AI is just an automation tool that will require human intervention every time a new task comes up. Pick your camp.
-
ARC-AGI 3 Highlights Remaining Gaps Between Human and AI Capabilities
By
–
Veremos como acabamos el año! Como siempre, ARC-AGI 3 encontrando esos gaps donde humanos e IA se diferencian ¿Resolverlo nos ofrece una AGI? No, pero la existencia de estos gaps de capacidades nos indican que aún queda mucho trabajo por hacer.