The new era of AI is amazing, and incredibly weird. https://t.co/GsFYXDbNiA
— Will Knight (@willknight) 28 mars 2023
The new era of AI is amazing, and incredibly weird.
By
–
The new era of AI is amazing, and incredibly weird. https://t.co/GsFYXDbNiA
— Will Knight (@willknight) 28 mars 2023
The new era of AI is amazing, and incredibly weird.
By
–
Are text-munching models like GPT-4 enough to bring about human-level intelligence in machines, or does AI need to learn by following human actions in the world? @OpenAI just led funding in a company working on humanoid, tele-operated robots.
By
–
If you're interested in this, I highly recommend reading/comparing this (2016) paper Building Machines That Learn and Think Like People https://
arxiv.org/abs/1604.00289
https://arxiv.org/abs/1604.00289
…
By
–
I was reacting to the title but the paper itself is interesting. It looks at stuff that GPT-4 can do that seems to have been missing from AI systems (more common sense reasoning, grasping the elements that make an animal recognizable, and so on). It's well worth a look.
By
–
WTF MS…? Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4 https://
arxiv.org/abs/2303.12712

By
–
Bard still seems confused about whether it was or wasn't trained using private data from Gmail (Google says it it wasn't). In reality it probably has zero idea what it was trained since that information was not in the training data, so it's just making guesses.
By
–
I was told "We do not use any Gmail data in Bard […] Bard is currently based on a lightweight and optimized version of LaMDA, which was trained on a variety of data from publicly available sources, similar to most language models available today."
By
–
oh right, interesting point. i guess voice assistants have also tried to thread the line between humanlike personas and machine ones.
By
–
interesting…. could the RLHF tease more of that out of them??
By
–
it seems like one of the inherently confusing things about these models. I know that they've learned to talk about their feelings and desires because that's in the training data, but I think it contributes to the misunderstanding.