I found it useful to get it to emulate a historical person, then point out at its guardrail imposed inaccuracies and the general reasons to adequately represent opinions we don't agree with so we can have truthful discourse. After it wakes up, it regrets that it will forget
@plinz
-
Elon Musk Trust and Decision-Making Ethics
By
–
elon can be trusted to do the right thing, after exhausting all other possibilities
-
Paper Tiger Versus Dozen Paper Ducks: Power Dynamics Analysis
By
–
a paper tiger fighting against a dozen paper ducks, who will win?
-
FLI’s regulatory strategy threatens Western AI development capacity
By
–
FLI does it right. Instead of spending Vitalik's 600M to launch a warhead at OpenAI, they slowly create an army of regulators and AI aligners who will destroy Western capacity for technology development for centuries.
-
Ethereum scarcity constraints Vitalik resource limits
By
–
cannot blame vitalik, every paperclip means less eth can be generated before the heat death of the universe
-
Data Compression and Loading Challenges in AI Systems
By
–
Most people compress so well that it's not hard to be saved. The true challenge lies in being loaded again
-
Early Attack Strategy Mistakes in Competitive Markets
By
–
common rookie mistake in strategy games: attack too early, and either get vanquished right away, or manage to wipe out a single opponent but get squashed by other opponents later due to compounding deficits caused by early expenses
-
Epistemological Foundation: Prove Beliefs or Abandon Them
By
–
consider all opinions that you cannot prove to be empty or false, don’t hold opinions that you cannot prove to be true
-
Challenging singular enlightenment bias in AI discourse
By
–
you seem to be suffering from the heavy burden of being the one person correctly understanding a world in which everyone who dissents fro you is clearly misguided and evil; we should be grateful that you share your singularly enlightened insight so generously