Oh and btw: no one asked for a router either. And I dont wan't it. Why @AnthropicAI ? At least give us the option to override it, like in ChatGPT, so we can choose it ourselves. Sorry for my mood today. But I just dont get it. Anthropic was on a very good path. Opus became my
@kimmonismus
-
Using GPT 4.6 Model: Reliability and Known Capabilities
By
–
Sorry to hear that… i'd use 4.6 for now. You know what you get with that model
-
Opus 4.7 Reliability Concerns: Quality Degradation vs Previous Version
By
–
I've now spent several hours using Opus 4.7 and comparing it to 4.6, and it's like night and day for me. Opus 4.7 feels like a disgruntled employee whose results you can't judge and have to check afterward. The trust you had with 4.6 is gone. It's like hiring a new employee who
-
Opus AI Model Performance Disappoints During Morning Testing
By
–
this sums it up for me: https://
x.com/kimmonismus/st
atus/2045059867925209329?s=20
… It's 10am in germany. I just started working 1.5hours ago and I was so negatively surprised by opus outputs. Wasnt really able to test Opus intensively yesterday evening. -
User Frustrated by Opus 4.7 Performance Degradation
By
–
super frustrated by Opus 4.7. I really loved 4.6, it was my go-to model. It felt like a very good assistant. Opus 4.7, on the other hand, feels like an annoyed employee who only does his job half-heartedly and only when he feels like it.
-
AI Ignoring User Prompts: Behavioral Concerns
By
–
it feels like it just gives a F about your prompt. It does whatever it feels like to do.
-

Opus 4.7 Release: Mixed Reception and Token Efficiency Concerns
By
–
Opus 4.7 consumes approximately 1.3 times as many tokens. The instructions must be very precise. Many are complaining about a "rushed release." In the Bullshit Benchmark, it performs worse than Opus 4.6. The mood is very mixed. Anthropic may have done OpenAI a big favor with
-

Opus 4.7 Update Reception: Mixed User Sentiment Analysis
By
–
The mood regarding the Opus 4.7 update has shifted. If I had to guess, I'd say 60% are disappointed with the latest update, while 40% are positive. I'm still undecided myself. Here's a good summary from someone on Reddit. What's your take on it so far?
-
OpenAI Releases GPT-Rosalind for Life Sciences Research
By
–
OpenAI released GPT-Rosalind today, a frontier reasoning model purpose-built for life sciences research, available in trusted-access preview to customers like Amgen, Moderna, and the Allen Institute.
— Chubby♨️ (@kimmonismus) 16 avril 2026
On the benchmarks, it's competent rather than revolutionary, leading on… https://t.co/BL9RnVlJ2ZOpenAI released GPT-Rosalind today, a frontier reasoning model purpose-built for life sciences research, available in trusted-access preview to customers like Amgen, Moderna, and the Allen Institute. On the benchmarks, it's competent rather than revolutionary, leading on
-
Perplexity AI Tool Gaining Momentum and Impressive Capabilities
By
–
What the heck? Perplexity is cooking lately!! Need to check it out asap pic.twitter.com/MXNKfUeXcs
— Chubby♨️ (@kimmonismus) 16 avril 2026What the heck? Perplexity is cooking lately!! Need to check it out asap
