How is their compute time measured exactly? They don't specify the details on their site AFAICT.
@jeremyphoward
-
Ambiguity in Compute Execution Calculation Methods
By
–
They don't specify how they calculate when the compute "runs"
-
True Scaling Requires Pay-Per-Computation Pricing Models
By
–
When I say "can scale up", jumping from an anemic free tier to an $80/month instance doesn't count. The scaling has to be based on *actual computation time*.
-
Scaling Limitations Fixed Instance Sizes Infrastructure Challenges
By
–
No it doesn't scale up smoothly – requires fixed instance sizes.
-
Cloud Provider Pricing Models: Fixed vs Usage-Based Billing
By
–
Most providers either charge you a fixed monthly fee for some sized instance, or charge you for each 5 min period that you have >=1 query (which in practice means you'll pay for the whole month anyway).
-
Postgres Provider Recommendations for Cost-Effective Database Computing
By
–
Does anyone have suggestions for a Postgres provider that: – Only charges compute for time the DB is *actually* computing something
– Minimum cost is <=$10/month
– Can scale up. Only one I've found so far is @Railway
. -
Answer.AI seeks investment funding for AI venture
By
–
Do you have a number in mind if http://
Answer.AI were to become an investor? We could help you cover those costs. -
Politician Recognizing Vote-Winners in Tech Policy
By
–
He's an experienced and successful politician. Which means he's good at recognising vote-winners.
-
New wearable AI device launches without monthly subscription
By
–
New wearable just dropped — doesn't even require a monthly subscription:
-
CEO Startup Supports SB 1047 Against Industry Opposition
By
–
AFAIK this is the 1st and only CEO of a startup that actually has a product lots of people use that has come out in support of SB 1047. How many startups are on the record against SB 1047 now? It was many hundreds last time I checked.