American science did great when it got loads of gov funding. It's made the country super rich now. All the biggest most successful companies are built on US tech dominance. Anyhoo, that's all in the past now. Have fun in your secured borders. 🙂
@jeremyphoward
-
Deaf Equity: AI Medical Technology Ethics Debate
By
–
Making deaf people not deaf leads to more equity, which is Bad, apparently.
-
Inequality and Opportunity Destruction in Technological Progress
By
–
It means people are so blinded by their desire to hurt those less fortunate that they're prepared to destroy everything to ensure no-one else has opportunities.
-
AI Ethics and Medical Treatment Policy Equity Debate
By
–
We're not allowed to cure deafness, because it's an "equity objective".
-
Deafness Cure Research Cancelled Over Equity Policy Controversy
By
–
Study by my genius friend to CURE DEAFNESS cancelled because, I shit you not: "Research programs based primarily on artificial and non-scientific categories, including amorphous equity objectives, are antithetical to the scientific inquiry". Decel anti-science brain-dead take. https://
x.com/manorlaborator
/manorlaboratory/status/1941703571910566059
… -
GCHQ Connections evaluation discussed with Boris Power
By
–
BTW I mentioned the GCHQ Connections eval idea to @BorisMPower quite a while ago, and I think he was planning to check it out.
-
O3 AI Model Achieves Impressive Progress Milestone
By
–
(None of that is to detract from how impressive it is that O3 has gotten as far as it has.)
-
AI struggles with harder versions of the game task
By
–
Oh yes I know! Just saying that that's by far the easiest version; and often it can't figure out the final category description (which isn't part of the evals AFAICT). It makes no progress on the other 2 versions of the game that I mentioned.
-
Semantic Understanding in AI Evaluation Metrics
By
–
Our family rules are that it only counts as "solved" if you figure out the final category descriptor correctly (i.e semantically close, not identical wording). NYT's Connections Bot mentions the same thing sometimes. I don't think the current evals check this AFAIK.
-
FastHTML Sample App in 84 Lines of Code
By
–
BTW the whole fasthtml sample app is just 84 lines of code. Here's a version without the comments if you just want to read the code itself: