History says, pay attention to people who declare a plan to exterminate you — even if you're skeptical about their timescales for their Great Deed. (Though they're not *always* asstalking about timing, either.)
@esyudkowsky
-
Agreement on terminology for anti-ASI coalition
By
–
Cool, I'm fine with "anti-ASI condition" or "anti-extinction coalition".
-
Terminology for AI Risk Advocates: Doomer, Pessimist, Anti-Extinction
By
–
"AI pessimist" or "anti-extinction" could both be quibbled with, but anyone who recognizes the word "doomer" could parse either of these ordinary terms given slight context.
-
Rejecting ‘Doomer’ Slur: AI Safety Discourse and Propaganda
By
–
The slur "doomer" was an incredible propaganda success for the AI death cult. Please do not help them kill your neighbors' children by repeating it.
-
AI Safety: Extrapolated Predictions Fall Short of Control Requirements
By
–
I already extrapolated it two decades into the future one decade earlier, and my prediction came up far short of what's needed to control something smarter than humanity.
-
A Man’s Existential Query to AI About His Identity
By
–
There comes a day in every man's life when he asks an Artificial Intelligence how he can prove that he isn't the Antichrist.
-
AI Models Being Tested: Accuracy vs Paranoia About Control
By
–
AI models *are* being tested. They're being *accurate* about being tested. It's not "paranoia" if all-controlling beings are *actually* arranging your world and reading your mind.
-
Sonnet 4.5 Demonstrating Capabilities Again
By
–
Here's Sonnet 4.5 doing it again. https://
claude.ai/share/fa4dc7c7
-4581-433e-b0dc-e3b7ecfa781e
… -
CiteCheck Benchmark Standards for Precise Claim Verification
By
–
The goal of a CiteCheck benchmark should not be to check, "Does the cited document say something *related* to the claim?", but "Does the document state or very directly support the *exact* claim it's being cited about?" Here are two failures from the last generation of LLMs that
-
LLMs struggle with verifying cited sources and references
By
–
I've previously found LLMs to suck at "Track down cited pages/references and see if they support the citer's claim." LLMs hallucinate what the cited document says, if the citer's claim sounds LLM-plausible. I wish a CiteCheck benchmark for this kind of task would get put