The talk around openness & AI needs to distinguish between the vibrant and innovative open source movement that is advancing the state-of-the-art on harnesses & other key areas and open weights frontier models, which are entirely dependent on a the goodwill of a few Chinese firms
@emollick
-
Human reaction to AI gains: muddling through instead of rational planning
By
–
It may be obvious, but a lot of the first reaction to the gains in AI capability is going to be "just muddling through" rather than executing on a rational plan. (this is what humans always do in rapidly changing & complex situations, and it certainly seems to be happening here)
-
AI diffusion model discovers Big Mac and creates optimized burgers
By
–
Finally, AI finds its ultimate uncontroversial use. A diffusion model trained on burger recipes "discovers the classic Big Mac without explicit supervision and generates novel burgers optimized for deliciousness, sustainability, or nutrition." ASI= automated slider intelligence
-
Comparison of Claude and GLM-5.2 on self-reflective persona
By
–
Which one is Claude is pretty obvious. GLM-5.2 is a beast in some ways, but doesn't have the self-reflective persona of Claude, and isn't really into introspection (or a simulation thereof).
-

Request for AI to propose poems about GenAI models’ state
By
–

If you want to read an interesting AI thinking trace, try "I want you to suggest two poems that you think apply very well to the current state of GenAI models like you. Don’t just pick popular poems and back justify. Think hard about options first" in either GLM-5.2 or Opus 4.8
-
Companies overlook fine-tuned self-hosted GLM; users prefer brand names
By
–
Most companies are not even thinking about giving every employee a fine-tuned self-hosted version of GLM that they need to update and keep harnessed and build connectors for. There are lots of places where roll-your-own AI stacks make sense, but end users want name brands.
-
Companies’ AI stack plans vs employee demand for simple ChatGPT access
By
–
I feel like on X all you hear about is elaborate plans by firms to build their own AI stacks but in my experience companies are full of people who want access to Claude or ChatGPT and are pressuring their purchasing staff to get licenses so they can just use the tools they know.
-
AI regulation will not ignore open source loophole
By
–
The point is that AI regulation will not somehow ignore open source as a loophole.
-
US can ban open weights models for companies
By
–
As this post points out, contrary to what many say, the US government could absolutely effectively ban open weights models. That doesn’t mean you won’t be able to download the weights & run them, but they can ensure that no US company would use or provide access or host them
-
Government safety concerns about frontier AI and open source risks
By
–
It would be very useful to understand more about the government safety concerns associated with frontier AI releases so we could (a) know what risks everyone will face if/when open source reaches Mythos class & (b) whether they are doing enough or too much to prevent those risks.