But "male and female groups in this sample" doesn't mean anything — unless you are generalizing to "male and female groups" beyond sample. Which would require appropriate sampling procedures, which are missing.
@emilymbender
-
New York Times criticized for poor AI coverage
By
–
The @nytimes continues to be trash at covering anything to do with "AI". Thank you, @YaelEisenstat for highlighting this latest installment.
-
Stochastic Parrots Paper Accessible via ACM Digital Library
By
–
Thank you, @cher0x801 Also — Stochastic Parrots was published as Open Access. There's absolutely no need to point to random storage locations. It will remain accessible at its point of publication in the ACM Digital Library:
-
Ableism in AI Discourse: Critiquing Blindness Metaphors
By
–
In case it isn't obvious why this is ableism — it's equating blindness with lack of knowledge or inability to know. This is harmful and detracts from the point.
-
Public Inattention and Tech Obfuscation in Surveillance Systems
By
–
The overall point is a good one, and would be more effectively made by talkin about "inattention" (on the part of the populace) or "obfuscation" (on the part of those selling or using surveillance tech). >>
-
Machine Intelligence Political Deployment Society Blindness Concern
By
–
So it's really a shame that the article ends like this: "It is not AI but our sense of fatalism and our blindness to the way human societies are already deploying machine intelligence for political ends that should most worry us." There's no call to use "blindness" there. >>
-
Moral Outsourcing: Removing Humans From AI Accountability
By
–
"Too often when we talk of the “problem” of AI, we remove the human from the picture. We practise a form of what the social scientist and tech developer Rumman Chowdhury calls “moral outsourcing”: blaming machines for human decisions." >>
-
Digital Panopticon: AI Systems Require Human Accountability
By
–
"We have stumbled into a digital panopticon almost without realising it. Yet to suggest we live in a world shaped by AI is to misplace the problem. There is no machine without a human, and nor is there likely to be." >>
-
False arrests and facial recognition: AI ethics debate gap
By
–
"[False arrests w/face rec tech] should be at the heart of one of the most urgent contemporary debates: that of artificial intelligence and the dangers it poses. That it is not, and that so few recognise it as significant, shows how warped has become the discussion of AI," >>
-
Op-ed critique: ableism and AGI misconceptions in AI discourse
By
–
There's a lot I like in this op-ed, but unfortunately it ends with some gratuitous ableism (and also weird remarks about AGI as a "holy grail"). First, the good parts: