What if the real goal of AI isn’t what we’ve been told?

Co-founder of the Center for Humane Technology, Tristan Harris, argues that the ultimate goal of many AI technocrats is not just to help humanity… but to advance their own pursuit of money and power.

That framing changes… pic.twitter.com/ETfhSPdEcg

— Pascal Bornet (@pascal_bornet) 6 avril 2026

What if the real goal of AI isn’t what we’ve been told? Co-founder of the Center for Humane Technology, Tristan Harris, argues that the ultimate goal of many AI technocrats is not just to help humanity… but to advance their own pursuit of money and power. That framing changes how you interpret everything else. To the public, AI is presented as progress: More creativity. More freedom. Better work. But internally, the incentive structure is different. AI offers productivity without the ongoing cost of human labor. What stands out to me is how this shifts the equation. If systems can replace large parts of human work, value doesn’t disappear — it concentrates. Fewer workers. More centralized control. Greater accumulation at the top. The first time you connect these dynamics, the trajectory becomes clearer. This isn’t just a technological shift. It’s an economic one. And this is where things start to matter. Because the real question is no longer what AI can do. It’s who benefits from what it does. So here’s something I’d be curious to hear from you: As AI continues to scale, how should we think about power, ownership, and value distribution? #ArtificialIntelligence #AI #FutureOfWork #Economics #Innovation

→ View original post on X — @pascal_bornet, 2026-04-06 05:01 UTC