While we don’t permit or endorse the use of LMs for high-risk automated decision making, it’s crucial to anticipate the potential societal impacts and risks of these models as early as possible.
REGULATION
-
AI Executive Order: Workforce Gaps Challenge Implementation Progress
By
–
Workforce gaps remain one of the biggest challenges in implementing the @POTUS AI executive order. Among the requirements, workforce policy generated the most to-do items, according to a new tracker by @stanfordhai
, @StanfordCRFM
, and RegLab researchers. -
Standards and Benchmarks for AI Safety and Innovation
By
–
it connects the Safety & Responsibility crowd with the Model/Data Innovation crowd, and tries to establish standards and benchmarks that these two sets of crowds can agree are good.
Think of it as establishing a standard that you can subscribe to if it benefits your cause — -
Commercializing Superior LLM Models: Safety Certification Strategy
By
–
You've created a superior llama/mistral-derivative model (like @teknium often does).
How can you convince the world to use it (and pay you)? Step 1: You need a 3rd party to approve that this model is safe and responsible.
the Purple Llama project starts to bridge this gap! -
No Single Company Should Control AI Development
By
–
No single company should own and control our AI.
-
ANITI and Ekitia publish results of their citizen survey on AI
By
–
[#Article]
@ANITI_Toulouse and @Ekitia_ publish the results of their citizen survey on #AI https://actuia.com/actualite/aniti-et-ekitia-publient-les-resultats-de-leur-enquete-citoyenne-sur-lia/
… #artificialintelligence -
Sakana AI joins Alliance for open AI development approach
By
–
Sakana AI is proud to be a founding member of the AI Alliance, alongside University of Tokyo, Sony and others in Japan. As we’ve seen, the real ‘danger’ of AI is for it to be developed and owned by a single company. An open approach makes much more sense. https://
thealliance.ai -
Chinese Tech Company Operating Illegally in China Faces Regulatory Scrutiny
By
–
If I were a betting man, I’d say that they are a Chinese tech company in most ways that matter, with the tiny infelicity that their business is illegal in China. A certain amount of shadiness is allowable… as long as you don’t make the powers that be look circumvented.
-
Responsible AI Deployment Requires Societal Analysis in Design
By
–
In a recent #TIME100Talks, @stanfordhai vice director @landay stressed the need for responsible AI deployment and building societal analysis into the design process: “AI technologies have an impact way beyond the direct user you’re designing for.” https://
bit.ly/41bNd1J -
AI Regulation Trials and Tribulations in Europe and DC
By
–
Our A.I reporters on the ground in Europe and D.C. — @satariano and @ceciliakang — explain the once and future trials and tribulations of A.I. regulation: https://
nytimes.com/2023/12/06/tec
hnology/ai-regulation-policies.html
…