Policy makers should consider the interactions between AI, data, competition law, security/privacy & carbon/ climate/ energy policy. There are emerging techniques that help address these issues such as Federated Learning w/Differential Privacy;
RAG w/LLMs;
Context based
REGULATION
-
AI Policy: Balancing Competition, Security, Privacy and Sustainability
By
–
-
Federal Government Sues Apple Over Market Reach and Influence
By
–
Read the Lawsuit Against Apple: The suit is the federal government’s most significant challenge to the reach and influence of the company. https://
nytimes.com/interactive/20
24/03/21/technology/apple-lawsuit.html?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter
… #Technology #Tech #FutureTech -
Privacy and Free Expression in AI: Critical Concerns
By
–
For anyone who cares about privacy and free expression, this is really important
-
US Sues Apple for Maintaining iPhone Monopoly
By
–
U.S. Sues Apple, Accusing It of Maintaining an iPhone Monopoly: The lawsuit caps years of regulatory scrutiny of Apple’s wildly popular suite of devices and services, which have fueled its growth into a nearly $3 trillion… https://
nytimes.com/2024/03/21/tec
hnology/apple-doj-lawsuit-antitrust.html?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter
… #Technology #Tech #FutureTech -
Military AI Contracts: Transparency and Ethical Implications Examined
By
–
There is no known contract with Hamas. There is a large, and well documented contract with the Israeli military.
-
Quantum Tech and Federal Government Risk Reduction Actions Live
By
–
Join us live in one hour for a dive into some exciting quantum tech and a high level overview of federal government actions to reduce quantum risks: https://
carahevents.carahsoft.com/Event/Details/
461813-QLabs
… -
Tech Workers Stand Against Harmful AI Development
By
–
Well, because it's not legal. But beyond that, why say this? Aren't you heartened that some of the most powerful/least accountable corps in the world employ people willing to stand up to management on behalf of those harmed by the technologies they develop and profit from?
-
Tech Workers Stand Against Harmful AI Development
By
–
Why would you say that? Are you not heartened that some of the most powerful yet least accountable corporations in the world employ people willing to stand up to management on behalf of those harmed by the technologies they develop and profit from?
-
Geoff’s departure over weapons research rejection explained
By
–
On Geoff moving due to rejection of weapons research (a mention, I'd love a more fulsome account if anyone knows one)
-
Tech Workers’ Historic Stand Against Weapons Development
By
–
This is a historic tech action.
— Meredith Whittaker (@mer__edith) 16 avril 2024
A long proud tradition. From Polaroid workers rejecting their work contributing to S Africa's passbooks, to the MIT research strike where scientists refused to work for warfare; to Geoff Hinton relocating to Canada to avoid building US weapons. https://t.co/CiBi0SoDxkThis is a historic tech action. A long proud tradition. From Polaroid workers rejecting their work contributing to S Africa's passbooks, to the MIT research strike where scientists refused to work for warfare; to Geoff Hinton relocating to Canada to avoid building US weapons.