I think the availability of open-source AI platforms is crucial for everyone, but I agree with you that it is particularly crucial for developing countries.
POLICY
-
Agency Limitations for AI Risk Management and Natural Disasters
By
–
That's my point. Our agency is kimited for events like pandemics, earthquakes, tornadoes, meteor strikes, and other natural phenomena. The best we can do is take some preemptive defensive measures and hope for the best. But for AI and other manifestations of human activity, we
-
LLM Output Filters and Copyright Compliance Deception
By
–
If their argument was true, they wouldn't need output filters for Copyrighted materials, but LLMs and proprietary services do… and thus they are lying to cover their tracks.
-
Claude Copyright Lawsuit: Training Data and Protected Expressions
By
–
This is easily disproven. Claude can output Copyrighted expressions and is being sued for it. Therefore, training wasn't "non-expressive" as the model cannot distinguish what is protected and what is not — everything is ingested. It inherently falls under Copyright.
-
Historical gun control as model for AI regulation strategy
By
–
How about “Restrained and controlled”. One friend mentioned Japan’s control of guns from 1545-1879 as an example.
-
Good faith debate on AI dataset release ethics
By
–
How did those releasing the dataset engage in a good faith debate? Is it possible for such a debate to happen after the fact?
-
Copyright concerns and DSM compliance in AI development
By
–
You're willingly trying to destroy Copyright, it's fair to expect an adversarial response. The DSM exists, your interpretation of it is not grounded in reality.
-
Fair Use Rules in AI: Balanced Perspective on Rhetoric
By
–
What rethoric in particular? I have tried to refine my views to be some of the most balanced and reasonable of almost anyone in this debate. Fair Use serves a purpose and is fine to rely on if you follows its rules, and abide by those expectations.
-
Regulating Large Models Supporting Smaller AI Startups Growth
By
–
Yes, absolutely. @sama suggests we need to regulate large models and support startups in creating smaller ones for growth. This would allow humans to attach limbs to GPTs through custom actions (APIs) without the competition of giants, even as it seems we're volunteering for
-
Fair Use Criteria and AI Research Innovation Beyond Scaling
By
–
I wouldn't call it theft because it's inaccurate. Transformative is only one of the criteria that must be fulfilled in order to obtain Fair Use. Sad to see you think brute force scaling is the only way forward for research; shows a lack of imagination and innovation.