Well, if you agree it's a business decision then we've already corrected the "inevitable" part of your original statement — which was my intent. I don't understand your framing of the question. Companies large and small can build useful models legally.
POLICY
-
Adobe Firefly Legal and Ethical Concerns Beyond Training Data
By
–
Of course, Adobe Stock also has many questions surrounding its legality and it should be scrutinized. But the fact that's the topic for Firefly is a step well beyond training on infringing content, or worse illegal content. Again, it's a business decision.
-
Licensed Content in Diffusion Models: Business Decision Not Inevitability
By
–
The fact that there are diffusion models with properly licensed content suggests it's not "inevitable", but rather a business decision.
-
ML Models Cannot Distinguish Copyrighted Patterns Judges Say
By
–
Ultimately, the burden of proof is on them? He's wrong in that there is no mechanism built-in to distinguish Copyrighted patterns from non-Copyrighted ones. Even judges struggle to find the difference, and somehow we're supposed to believe ML engineers solved that accidentally?
-
Plagiarism degrees elite universities White House Executive Order
By
–
Plagiarism degrees from elite universities. A plagiarism White House Executive Order.
-
Copyright Fair Use Debate in AI Training and USCO Submission
By
–
The USCO submission he has his name on argues it's non-expressive use, which he now seemingly disagrees with by saying it falls under Copyright but should be considered Fair Use.
-
Internet Data Scraping and Copyright Infringement in AI
By
–
❝ Just grabbing information off the internet is *definitely* copyright infringement. ❞
-
Why Multiple Standards for Generative AI Could Be Beneficial
By
–
Maybe it is a good thing that there isn’t a single “RMS” of Generative AI
-
Tech Invents Imaginary Threats Instead of Real Problems
By
–
The tech community clearly doesn't have enough real threats, because it seems to keep coming up with imaginary ones — from "AI x-risk" to "decelerationists", a group that supposedly opposes progress and advocates for planned decline.