Report calls for #AI toy safety standards to protect young children
by @Cambridge_Uni @TechXplore_com Learn more: https://
bit.ly/41miWxW #ArtificialIntelligence #MachineLearning #ML
POLICY
-
AI Toy Safety Standards Needed to Protect Young Children
By
–
-
Distributing AGI Benefits: A Path Beyond Technical Achievement
By
–
path to AGI is futile without distributing the benefits along the way
-
OFAC Regulation Interpretation and Legal Compliance in AI
By
–
You seem to be misunderstanding the law — it's not aligned with OFAC's actual statements AFAICT. Where are you getting your interpretation from? Surely OFAC is the appropriate authority here?
-
OFAC Sanctions Policy Impact on Scientific Publication Access
By
–
IIUC it's because NeurIPS is wrong. Office of Foreign Assets Control Director 2004: "scientific communities in sanctioned countries may publish their works in U.S. scholarly journals. This process is vital to promoting the free flow of information" https://
x.com/mengyer/status
/mengyer/status/2036835169282281502
… -
AI’s Real Constraint: The People Problem Not Physics
By
–
AI has a ‘people problem.’ And that might be its real constraint rather than physics. pic.twitter.com/8fOICuzV2A
— Nina Schick (@NinaDSchick) 25 mars 2026AI has a ‘people problem.’ And that might be its real constraint rather than physics.
-
Global AI safety policy needed to address superhuman AI risks
By
–
Speaking as the author of the NYT bestselling book on the danger of superhuman AI: I agree that policy to stop the reckless AI race must be global. An AI does not need to run in an American datacenter to threaten an American life. Hopefully that part can achieve broad support.
→ View original post on X — @esyudkowsky, 2026-03-25 19:31 UTC
-
CCP Trolls Exploit Unrestricted Tweet Replies Online
By
–
When you forget to limit the replies to your tweets and the CCP trolls show up. pic.twitter.com/mKJb0D5ObU
— 🖤 Christine (@christinelu) 25 mars 2026When you forget to limit the replies to your tweets and the CCP trolls show up.
-
U.S. Sanctions Law Implications for Academic Peer Review Participation
By
–
Participation in peer review at @NeurIPSConf (or @icmlconf, @iclr_conf, @CVPR, @COLM_conf, etc.) can be considered providing a "service" under U.S. sanctions law. U.S. law generally prohibits providing services to designated sanctioned individuals or entities, including cases where the process is effectively providing a service to a sanctioned institution. Violations can lead to significant fines and compliance overhead; willful violations can carry criminal exposure to the organizers and board members. Note that the "informational materials" exemption (Berman Amendment) likely does not apply here, based on legal advice.
→ View original post on X — @hugo_larochelle, 2026-03-25 19:06 UTC
-
Critique of AI Safety Group’s Strategy Against AGI Risks
By
–
ninhuem: nada portuguesas: TU TENTO JA FRANCESINHAAAAA??????!!!!!!!!! PVVVV
