Yeah, it really seems like the jailbreak was 'fix this code'.
LLMS
-

AI quality isn’t measured by token count, says Databricks scientist
By
–
"Just trying to use the most AI is like maximizing the number of lines of code you write. That's not a good measure of software quality, nor is the number of tokens." Databricks Chief AI Scientist @jefrankle kicked off tonight's DevConnect Meetup at #DataAISummit 2026 by
-
GLM is good but inconsistent and requires more steering than Kimi K2.7
By
–
GLM is really good when it gets it right, but it is inconsistent out of the box and requires more steering in my testing than Kimi K2.7
-

Local LLMs Web Access with SearXNG, Firecrawl, Camofox
By
–
PROP TIP Running LLMs locally? Give them web access My setup: – SearXNG: candidate source discovery – Firecrawl: known-URL scraping and crawling – Camofox: browser fallback when JS/interaction gets annoying Search → Extract → Interact Tell your favorite agent to set this
-
Codex supports Chrome DevTools protocol for inspecting and modifying websites
By
–
OPENAI 🔥: Codex now supports Chrome DevTools Protocol for browser use. This is a huge superpower that will allow Codex to inspect and modify any website.
— 🚨 AI News | TestingCatalog (@testingcatalog) 16 juin 2026
It is still a very early implementation, but I bet that in several years this will be a default browser capability. If… pic.twitter.com/mvLpRwnUXIOPENAI: Codex now supports the Chrome DevTools protocol for use in the browser. This is a considerable superpower that will allow Codex to inspect and modify any website. This is still a very early implementation, but
-
Codex talks to Fable 5 via plugin and comparison with claude-channel-cli
By
–
Here's Codex talking to Fable 5 w/ my plugin.
— Aaron Ng (@localghost) 15 juin 2026
Unlike calling the API, `claude-channel-cli` talks to the same full Claude Code harness as you. This means you can talk to either AI & they'll guide each other naturally with shared memories, decisions, and research. pic.twitter.com/GZAsdqnd5fHere is Codex talking to Fable 5 with my plugin. Unlike the API call, `claude-channel-cli` talks to the same full harness of Claude Code as you. This means you can talk to either AI and they will guide each other naturally with
-
Security bug discovery threatens model’s code writing capability
By
–
We won't know until/unless we hear what the bug actually was If it really was "asking Fable to find security bugs in code found security bugs" then it can't be fixed without making the model useless for writing any code at all, which is one of the most important use-cases
-
AI finding security bugs threatens code writing use case
By
–
We won't know until/unless we hear what the bug actually was If it really was "asking Fable to find security bugs in code found security bugs" then it can't be fixed without making the model useless for writing any code at all, which is one of the most important use-cases
-
Bug in finding security bugs threatens model’s code writing use-case
By
–
We won't know until/unless we hear what the bug actually was If it really was "asking Fable to find security bugs in code found security bugs" then it can't be fixed without making the model useless for writing any code at all, which is one of the most important use-cases
-
Opus not good enough for 3D and verification
By
–
Opus is nowhere near good enough at 3D/verification. I’ve done some Opus ultracode runs and it’s passable, but not great!
