
But for the *really* hard problems, Claude has a new trick — it can admit it doesn't know:

By
–

But for the *really* hard problems, Claude has a new trick — it can admit it doesn't know:

By
–


As a counter-balance to all the positivity I'm posting about Claude (a new model from @AnthropicAI
), starting a thread on limitations. First, for many calculation problems, hallucinations are just as bad as in ChatGPT — here's ChatGPT vs. Claude vs. a calculator:

By
–


Generating comedy with Claude (new model from @AnthropicAI
) is crazy easy. I’m holding back so I don’t misrepresent it, but this stuff is endless and you can filter/workshop it all day. If you bring it up to speed on “Jenna Ortega Reveals”, these are its first 10 tries:
By
–
That thread is what made me go attempt to do some of my work today with ChatGPT — optimizing a chunk of logic was on my todo list, so I asked ChatGPT. I was really impressed by how it understood the code, but then it made the logic error.

By
–

Side-by-side comparison: @OpenAI
's ChatGPT vs. @AnthropicAI
's Claude Each model is asked to compare itself to the machine from Stanisław Lem's "The Cyberiad" (1965) that can create any object whose name begins with "n":

By
–

Compared to ChatGPT, @AnthropicAI
's new model, Claude, feels somewhat less likely to make up facts, but the tendency is still there. E.g., when discussing what happened on each season of ABC's Lost, its memory is even more confused than most people's:
By
–
ChatGPT is not AGI, but it’s a mistake to fixate on AGI so much that we don’t see the progress it represents.

By
–
Or, if you prefer, in the style of Morty: "But I guess Anthropic's researchers are hoping that Constitutional AI and this principles-based approach is the way to go to keep AI systems like me from destroying humanity or something."
By
–
+1, data augmented generation will be key for insightful responses also chaining can help generate a more complex response in multiple steps