Specialized large-scale use cases on custom knowledge bases This is the category of custom enterprise use-cases, where you may have several thousands of calls per day and the LLM needs to have an understanding of a custom knowledgebase or task. /13
LLMS
-
Price-Competitive API Calls for General-Purpose LLM Use Cases
By
–
General-purpose use-case embedded in a product or service For these, a vanilla API call to SOTA LLM is sufficient. Price will be the key consideration here and as long as the large LLM providers have very competitive prices, making simple calls to their APIs will work. /12
-
Enterprise AI and LLM APIs: Two Classes of Business Use Cases
By
–
Enterprise AI and LLM APIs The other big category of LLM use cases is businesses using these LLMs in their core products, services, and business processes. There are 2 classes of use cases in this space. /11
-
Google, Meta, and OpenAI dominate consumer LLM market
By
–
All this means that we will end up with Google, Meta, and potentially OpenAI being the key players in the consumer LLM (e.g., ChatGPT, Bard, etc.) world. /9
-
General-Purpose vs. Specialized Tasks: When Fine-Tuning and RAG Matter
By
–
It's important to draw the distinction between general-purpose tasks like Python code generation vs. specialized tasks like having knowledge of the Abacus platform. The former typically DOES NOT require fine-tuning or RAG, while the latter requires some custom work. /8
-
GPT-4 Outperforms Specialized LLMs Across Tasks
By
–
This is unlikely to be the case for general-purpose tasks. Large SOTA LLMs outperform specialized LLMs in most tasks. Again GPT-4 outperforms specialized LLMs on pretty much everything from code generation to writing and reasoning tasks. /7
-
Will Specialized LLMs Emerge for Specific General-Purpose Tasks?
By
–
LLMs For General Purpose Tasks So the next question is will we have specialized LLMs for some general-purpose tasks like coding, reasoning, summarization, or writing? GPT-4 does really well on code compared to Google's LLMs, so will there be several purpose-built LLMs? /6
-
Bard vs GPT-4: Performance on Recent vs Historical Data
By
–
Already, Bard outperforms GPT-4 when it comes to queries about recent data and GPT-4 does much better on queries on data available before September 2021 (it's training cut-off date). /5
-
Google and Meta’s Data Advantage in LLM Development
By
–
Meta enjoys the same advantage in terms of being able to use Facebook and Instagram data. This will translate to Google and Meta LLMs being able to serve and respond to general information queries better than LLMs from OpenAI or other start-ups. /4
-
Google and Meta’s Competitive Advantage in LLM Training Data
By
–
Google and Meta have a huge advantage here compared to anyone else. Google, because of it's search dominance can get away with crawling every website that wants their search traffic and can use YouTube and potentially Gmail data to train their LLMs. /3