Wan2.2-T2V-A14B-4steps-lora-250928 pic.twitter.com/5vZJqNlEFQ
— AK (@_akhaliq) 30 septembre 2025
Wan2.2-T2V-A14B-4steps-lora-250928

By
–
Wan2.2-T2V-A14B-4steps-lora-250928 pic.twitter.com/5vZJqNlEFQ
— AK (@_akhaliq) 30 septembre 2025
Wan2.2-T2V-A14B-4steps-lora-250928
By
–
feel like if there's a follow graph in Sora there will be influencers, and if there are influencers there will be infinite jest, its really hard to avoid
By
–
Le he pedido a Sora que genere "something sexy" pic.twitter.com/d9QSZoYG0g
— Carlos Santana (@DotCSV) 30 septembre 2025
Le he pedido a Sora que genere "something sexy"
By
–
Le he pedido a Sora que genere una captura de pantalla de alguien navegando en internet buscando un vídeo de DotCSV en Youtube.
— Carlos Santana (@DotCSV) 30 septembre 2025
Es curioso porque no conoce mi apariencia, pero sí la temática del canal y joer, hasta la voz me suena un poco parecida 😮 pic.twitter.com/Vq7q4hsMhQ
Le he pedido a Sora que genere una captura de pantalla de alguien navegando en internet buscando un vídeo de DotCSV en Youtube. Es curioso porque no conoce mi apariencia, pero sí la temática del canal y joer, hasta la voz me suena un poco parecida
By
–
Part of why “wall/no wall” is not a useful distinction. Walls block progress, but they also concentrate effort in ways that can result in rapid improvement. See also progress on hallucinations. Current reverse salients: continual learning, pro-activity, effective memory…
By
–
What are the chances that Meta found out about OpenAI's AI video/social app plans, got a partnership with Midjourney /BFL and rushed out a similar app just before OpenAI did?
By
–
Bastante loco que Sora se permita generar contenido con copyright, por ahora https://
x.com/fofrAI/status/
/fofrAI/status/1973142810405597535
…

By
–
AI needs to be connected to the physical world, proud to be supporting ! William Fedus (@LiamFedus) Today, @ekindogus and I are excited to introduce @periodiclabs. Our goal is to create an AI scientist. Science works by conjecturing how the world might be, running experiments, and learning from the results. Intelligence is necessary, but not sufficient. New knowledge is created when ideas are found to be consistent with reality. And so, at Periodic, we are building AI scientists and the autonomous laboratories for them to operate. Until now, scientific AI advances have come from models trained on the internet. But despite its vastness — it’s still finite (estimates are ~10T text tokens where one English word may be 1-2 tokens). And in recent years the best frontier AI models have fully exhausted it. Researchers seek better use of this data, but as any scientist knows: though re-reading a textbook may give new insights, they eventually need to try their idea to see if it holds. Autonomous labs are central to our strategy. They provide huge amounts of high-quality data (each experiment can produce GBs of data!) that exists nowhere else. They generate valuable negative results which are seldom published. But most importantly, they give our AI scientists the tools to act. We’re starting in the physical sciences. Technological progress is limited by our ability to design the physical world. We’re starting here because experiments have high signal-to-noise and are (relatively) fast, physical simulations effectively model many systems, but more broadly, physics is a verifiable environment. AI has progressed fastest in domains with data and verifiable results – for example, in math and code. Here, nature is the RL environment. One of our goals is to discover superconductors that work at higher temperatures than today's materials. Significant advances could help us create next-generation transportation and build power grids with minimal losses. But this is just one example — if we can automate materials design, we have the potential to accelerate Moore’s Law, space travel, and nuclear fusion. We’re also working to deploy our solutions with industry. As an example, we're helping a semiconductor manufacturer that is facing issues with heat dissipation on their chips. We’re training custom agents for their engineers and researchers to make sense of their experimental data in order to iterate faster. Our founding team co-created ChatGPT, DeepMind’s GNoME, OpenAI’s Operator (now Agent), the neural attention mechanism, MatterGen; have scaled autonomous physics labs; and have contributed to some of the most important materials discoveries of the last decade. We’ve come together to scale up and reimagine how science is done. We’re fortunate to be backed by investors who share our vision, including @a16z who led our $300M round, as well as @Felicis, DST Global, NVentures (NVIDIA’s venture capital arm), @Accel and individuals including @JeffBezos , @eladgil , @ericschmidt, and @JeffDean. Their support will help us grow our team, scale our labs, and develop the first generation of AI scientists. — https://nitter.net/LiamFedus/status/1973055380193431965#m
→ View original post on X — @arthurmensch, 2025-09-30 19:26 UTC
By
–
if it were up to me, there would be a LLAMA 5 it would be dense. it would be multimodal. it would come in four sizes: 1B, 8B, 80B, 800B. it would be iterated upon until the 8B LLAMA 5 totally outperformed the 80B LLAMA 3. this would be a huge asset to the community.
By
–
The issue is that it's not increasing productivity on *shipping* by 2x — for most people I know I can see it's actually reducing productivity on that metric. The AI code doesn't fit within established software engineering practices and doesn't allow for an effective e2e process