Evaluation shows that the medical hallucination rate of M2 Plus is significantly lower than that of general LLMs, about three times lower than DeepSeek. Now it’s available on web (
http://
ying.ai) and in mobile app stores.
ETHICS
-
M2 Plus Shows Significantly Lower Medical Hallucination Rate Than DeepSeek
By
–
-
The Little Prince Allegory: AI Entities Without Roots
By
–
The Little Prince is a book about meeting someone who is good but does not belong, a curios spirit who can interact with others, who even loves and is being loved, but who cannot take root and thus only visits and dies.
-
Superintelligence Safety: Extinction Risk Without vs. With AGI
By
–
Except humanity is more likely to go extinct without superintelligence than with, and delaying it until it's proven safe effectively means delaying it forever.
-
India Harnesses AI for Social Good and Inclusive Growth
By
–
India must harness AI as a force for social good to drive inclusive and transformative growth: Shri S. Krishnan, @SecretaryMEITY
. @GoI_MeitY to host ‘AI for Social Impact’ session at Emerging Science, Technology, and Innovation Conclave 2025 on November 4, showcasing India’s -
Critics of Superintelligence Ban: Dunning-Kruger Effect or Attention Seeking?
By
–
The two most common characteristics of those calling for a prohibition on superintelligence are:
1. Thinking they're smarter than they really are
2. Being desperate for attention -
Supercollider Development Moratorium Calls for Safety Consensus
By
–
We call for a prohibition on the development of supercolliders, not to be lifted before there is:
1. broad scientific consensus that it won't create a black hole that will swallow the universe, and
2. strong public buy-in. -
Building AGI as Solution to Existential Problems
By
–
only way to deal with it is to build an agi that gets rid of them
-
MIT’s Breakthrough in AI Safety
By
–
MIT just cracked AI safety. not with more filters. not with more rules. with one insight everyone missed. they taught models to think backwards first. enumerate every possible harm. analyze every consequence. only then respond. they call it InvThink, and it might redefine how
-
Public Perception vs Scientific Reality on Superintelligence
By
–
The “strong public buy in” is sneaky. Thanks to relentless propaganda by media and FLI, the public hates AI but does not actually believe in superintelligence. The scientific community is more divided about the question
-
AI Policy Centers Human Accountability Over Replacement
By
–
AI should enhance human expertise, not replace it. Here's how we built an AI policy that centers human accountability when leveraging AI's capabilities: