The changing role of physicians in the era of democratizing information and knowledge https://
newyorker.com/culture/2025-i
n-review/the-role-of-doctors-is-changing-forever
… by @DhruvKhullar @NewYorker
ETHICS
-
Physician Role Transformation in Democratized Information Era
By
–
-
AI Research Security and Governance at Regional Summit
By
–
At the Regional AI Impact Summit 2025 in Odfisha, Mr. Prasant Mohapatra, Provost, University of South Florida (@USouthFlorida), spoke at the breakout session on the Impact of AI Research and Innovation. He highlighted the need for stronger security, governance, and safeguards as… pic.twitter.com/t4o994GYWj
— IndiaAI (@OfficialINDIAai) 19 décembre 2025At the Regional AI Impact Summit 2025 in Odfisha, Mr. Prasant Mohapatra, Provost, University of South Florida (
@USouthFlorida
), spoke at the breakout session on the Impact of AI Research and Innovation. He highlighted the need for stronger security, governance, and safeguards as -
Emotion-Based AI Transforms Computer Vision and Robotics Interactions
By
–
Emotion-based AI is a key differentiator in the new wave of computer vision and robotics, making interactions more natural and personalized while still protecting privacy and ethics. Source @Gartner_inc Link https://
gtnr.it/3KasVBM via @antgrasso #AI #ArtificialIntelligence -
Political Theory and Cognitive Oligopoly in Political Action
By
–
And the political action that @e_paniagua speaks about also requires that those of us who work in political theory have real understanding of how this "cognitive oligopoly" operates. [Translated from EN to English]
→ View original post on X — @e_paniagua, 2025-12-19 10:17 UTC
-
Should AI Systems Have Free Speech Rights?
By
–
Should AI Have Free Speech? #AI systems are already shaping what we see and believe, from #politics to #business. This article explores who really controls that #voice and what it means for the future of #freespeech.
-
Truth cannot depend on Google: a democratic risk
By
–
Truth cannot depend on Google
"It is a risk for democracy to delegate information to companies whose business depends on attention, not on truthfulness
They decide what we see, without transparency or accountability"
elpais.com/opinion/2025-12-1…
By @e_paniagua in @el_pais 🔒 [Translated from EN to English]→ View original post on X — @e_paniagua, 2025-12-19 05:52 UTC
-
AI safety conference seeks answers to potential downsides, highlights benefits
By
–
I ran an AI safety conference. And I look for answers to potential downfalls. AI tech will save many lives and make our economy way more productive. So I start there.
-
Chain-of-Thought Monitorability for AI Safety
By
–
New work on evaluating the quality of chain-of-thought monitorability. Chain-of-thought monitorability is a very encouraging opportunity for safety and alignment, making it easy to see what models are thinking:
-
Chain-of-thought monitoring as complementary mechanistic interpretability approach
By
–
We view chain-of-thought monitoring as complementary to mechanistic interpretability, not as a replacement for it. Because we believe that chain-of-thought monitoring is incredibly useful as a window into a model’s brain and could be a loadbearing layer in a scalable control
-
Measuring Chain-of-Thought Monitorability in AI Models
By
–
To preserve chain-of-thought (CoT) monitorability, we must be able to measure it. We built a framework + evaluation suite to measure CoT monitorability — 13 evaluations across 24 environments — so that we can actually tell when models verbalize targeted aspects of their