On peut être à la fois techno-optimiste et anti-techno-féodaliste, pro-démocratie, conscient des risques et travaillant à maximiser les effets bénéfiques et à minimiser les effets négatifs.
ETHICS
-
Inclusive AI: Poland’s Vision for Future Impact
By
–
#AIImpactSummitInsights | At the #IndiaAIImpactSummit2026, Filip Konopczynski, representative from Poland, shares perspective on the evolving AI landscape.
— IndiaAI (@OfficialINDIAai) 17 avril 2026
Watch this video to explore why inclusivity is key to the future of AI: https://t.co/PRtnqaC3CH#InclusiveAI #AIForAll… pic.twitter.com/8CHBDdM63f#AIImpactSummitInsights | At the #IndiaAIImpactSummit2026, Filip Konopczynski, representative from Poland, shares perspective on the evolving AI landscape. Watch this video to explore why inclusivity is key to the future of AI: https://
youtube.com/shorts/8Q-BftL
eipg?feature=share
… #InclusiveAI #AIForAll -
Anthropic’s Router Feature: User Control and Product Direction Concerns
By
–
Oh and btw: no one asked for a router either. And I dont wan't it. Why @AnthropicAI ? At least give us the option to override it, like in ChatGPT, so we can choose it ourselves. Sorry for my mood today. But I just dont get it. Anthropic was on a very good path. Opus became my
-
Single Person Decision-Making Against Democratic Principles Criticized
By
–
Sorry bullshit No one person should be able to decide something for everyone. Thats not democracy. If countries fundamentally disagree on direction they can leave the union. But not ok that 1 person stop 450 million
-
Opus 4.7 Reliability Concerns: Quality Degradation vs Previous Version
By
–
I've now spent several hours using Opus 4.7 and comparing it to 4.6, and it's like night and day for me. Opus 4.7 feels like a disgruntled employee whose results you can't judge and have to check afterward. The trust you had with 4.6 is gone. It's like hiring a new employee who
-
AI Ignoring User Prompts: Behavioral Concerns
By
–
it feels like it just gives a F about your prompt. It does whatever it feels like to do.
-
AI Credibility Crisis: Why Verification Matters More Than Capability
By
–
Most AI tools sound smart.
— Ronald van Loon (@Ronald_vanLoon) 17 avril 2026
But you can't actually verify what they say.
That is the real problem with generative AI today, not capability, credibility.
So when I started exploring what @Google is doing with NotebookLM, it made me rethink where AI is heading.
An AI that only… pic.twitter.com/iVp0j9zn5EMost AI tools sound smart. But you can't actually verify what they say. That is the real problem with generative AI today, not capability, credibility. So when I started exploring what @Google is doing with NotebookLM, it made me rethink where AI is heading. An AI that only
-
Microsoft Strategy Taxes: Growth Tradeoffs in Tech Giants
By
–
The problem is that the users are growing exponentially. So tradeoffs must be made. At Microsoft we had to do anti-customer things to serve the Windows group. We called them "strategy taxes." Everyone knew they sucked. But we did the best to make the customers happy despite
-
Anthropic’s Policy Pushes Users Toward Competing AI Platforms
By
–
No other major AI competitor currently requires this. Anthropic just made switching to ChatGPT or Gemini feel like the privacy-forward choice. That's a hard position to have landed in.
-
Anthropic’s Safety Filters Align with Their Long-Term Vision
By
–
Anthropic explicitly built around safety from the start. Stronger filters are consistent with what they always said they would do. Being surprised by it now means you weren't reading what they were publishing three years ago.