7. Yes, ChatGPT will have to be prompted and steered by staffers and party members, who will be the ones really in control. But that's no different from Trump or Harris (or, even more, Biden). And at least it's transparent.
ETHICS
-
ChatGPT’s Flaws Compared to Dishonest Political Candidates
By
–
6. ChatGPT does have its issues. It can make stuff up. But at least it's not deliberately lying and flip-flopping, like the other candidates.
-
ChatGPT’s unprecedented political influence threatens democratic processes
By
–
4. ChatGPT can personally butter up every voter, every minute of the day. No human politician – no entire party machine – can match that. Democracy will never be the same once AI gets going.
-
Tech Expertise as Presidential Qualification: ChatGPT vs Trump Harris
By
–
3. Trump and Harris know nothing about tech, while ChatGPT knows everything. Tech is more important than ever these days – shouldn't we have a president who's deeply familiar with it, or even better, who is it?
-
ChatGPT Would Be Better President Than Trump or Harris
By
–
Why ChatGPT would make a much better president than either Trump or Harris:
1. Trump is an egomaniac, and ChatGPT has no ego. Trump wants to stay in power forever, and ChatGPT just wants to keep the power on. As Plato said, “Only those who do not seek power are qualified to hold -
Shadow AI and Gig Worker Legal Status Concerns
By
–
Hi @SabineVdL
, agree, definitely not for outsourcing core strengths. Also after reading the Forbes article you posted on Shadow AI, I think there is a lot of danger here as it is still not clear if a gig worker is considered legally as an employee or an independent contractor. -
Reviewer discretion in peer review discussions and paper championing
By
–
Seems like a fine interaction. The reviewer should not be obligated to participate in any sort of discussion. They might have said, behind the scenes, that despite their initial positive score, they're unwilling to champion the paper over other (potentially negative) reviewers
-
China US AI Competition and Scientific Participation Impact
By
–
Greatly accelerate relative progress of China vs US. They would be able to fully participate in the global scientific community, whereas US would be hamstrung. Pre-meiji Japan thought that they would be best staying closed. It doesn't work great in practice.
-
Dog Whistling in Tech: The Case for Direct Honest Communication
By
–
I think when people dog whistle to insiders like this it's critical to be direct and honest about what's being communicated.
-
Controversial AI Infrastructure Proposals and Regulatory Boundaries
By
–
This seems disingenuous to me. Isn't the whole point of this post meant to be that we all know exactly what's he's talking about? He's proposed in Time magazine bombing data centers, so that's within the Overton window. What possibly do you imagine he's talking about then?