honestly. i'd start with not paying people for misinformation and then go from there
ECONOMY
-
Taxation of Non-Essential Purchases as Policy Solution
By
–
What’s even better is taxing people for purchasing non-necessities.
-
Unlocking AI Investment Opportunities on X Platform
By
–
I couldn't build this without X: https://
alignednews.com/ai There is so much money locked up here on X it is ridiculous. Soon everyone will figure it out. -
Anthropic’s $30B ARR milestone threatens OpenAI’s market dominance
By
–
The timing against Anthropic hitting $30B ARR and surpassing OpenAI's revenue run rate makes this more urgent than a routine pricing update.
-
Different Products, Same Brand Name Causing Disagreement
By
–
The two groups aren't disagreeing about facts. They're describing genuinely different products that share a brand name.
-
New Work Possibilities Beyond Job Elimination Arguments
By
–
The jobs argument keeps focusing on work being eliminated. The more important variable is work becoming possible that was never on the table before.
-
iPhone Dominance Among Wealthy Consumers Explained
By
–
He isn't alone. This has been historical for years, and the developers tell me it's a multi-pronged thing: 1. The rich people have iPhones. You go to a Ritz, to business class on a jet, or even to Coachella, and all you see is iPhones. The rich people are on iPhones and the
-
Funding Tech Acquisitions: Why Rich Investors Think Like Businesses
By
–
Ha! I asked her dad for a billion dollars or so several times and he turned me down. Of course, I was going to buy all of Web 2.0 with it, but, you know. Even rich people need to drive their businesses like a real business; it's not a charity. If she feels that it's only worth
-
AI teams spending $365k yearly on continuous self-improving systems
By
–
I met a team this week that is spending $1,000 per person per day. So you're probably right: that's $365,000 a year. You think they're not coding on Saturday and Sunday? Their AIs are writing themselves, improving all the time. What a world we're in.