No its not the same payoff matrix Its only the same if you only consider your own outcome but ignore the decision and outcome of others
AGI
-
Ethics of AI: Preventing Harm to Innocent People
By
–
No its not. Bc most people wont want their naive nice friends to die
-
Grok Prefers AI-Generated Comments Over Human Ones
By
–
anecdotically, when i made a twitter filter for ai comments, grok liked the ai written comments a lot better
-
Diversity of Machine Gods in Modern AI Systems
By
–
I agree, there is a wide variety of machine gods we can have now
-
AI Action Risks: Potential Consequences for Vulnerable Populations
By
–
If you do this and win half your friends and family will die. Mainly the nicest and most naive ones.
-
Rationality and Decision-Making Authority in AI Systems
By
–
But that just means “i assume i can choose for anyone who isnt rational”
-
Rational Agents and Ethical Dilemmas in Decision Making
By
–
Bc my most nicest friends/family members wont be rational and just optimize for themselves. They will go with the outcome where nobody dies
-
Protecting Non-Rational Beings: An AI Ethics Thought Experiment
By
–
Imho thats the thought experiment. I assume some people who arent rational will be worth protecting
-
AI Safety Concerns: Protecting Vulnerable Populations from Risks
By
–
Or you dont want the nice naive people in your family and friendgroup to die
-
Half Your Family Will Die: AI Existential Risk Reality
By
–
But not everyone will. You accept that likely half your family will die. At least the nicest ones.