Which AI lab do you trust the most to act in users’ best interests?
@tunguz
-
AI wrongly suspected bomb-making, stopped responding to user
By
–
I tried. It thought I was trying to make a bomb and stopped communicating with me.
-
Anthropic’s Fable 5 creates Eurocrat-as-a-Service product
By
–
With Fable 5 Anthropic managed to create a Eurocrat-as-a-Service product.
-
GPT 5.6 needs to match Fable without being nerfed
By
–
All GPT 5.6 needs now is to be in the same ballpark with Fable and not catastrophically nerfed.
-
Tunguz’s angry tweet about a terrible model release
By
–
The most retarded model release yet. What the f*** were they thinking?!??!?
-
Larger base model capacity improves training data memorization
By
–
Yes, because the base model has far more capacity than all the previous ones, so it's better at memorizing the training dataset.
-
Insider model access is the new insider trading
By
–
Insider model access is the new insider trading.
-
Risk of Account Suspension Using Public Fable 5 Model
By
–
Yeah, try doing it with the public Fable 5 model and you will be flagged for "security reasons" and your account could potentially get suspended. :/
-
Suspicion that Anthropic’s safety measures are performative
By
–
Starting to suspect that Anthropic's putative security and safety considerations are largely posturing and performative.
-
Fable 5 security audit fails, switches to Opus 4.8
By
–
I just tried to run a security audit of my own repo with Fable 5 and it automatically switched to Opus 4.8. So a hard no for their advertised cybersecurity capabilities when you can't even audit your own code!