I have employed ChatGPT to be a content assistant on TestingCatalog. 1. Revived my Zapier pro plan to enable multi-step tasks
2. Enabled billing for ChatGPT-4 API
3. Build a pipeline to turn my "tester notes" into a proper post-draft on Ghost Here is how it works
@testingcatalog
-
Building an AI-Powered Content Automation Pipeline
By
–
-
TikTok expands generative AI avatar feature to more users
By
–
Covered: TikTok rolled out AI-generated avatars feature for more users. Check it over here https://
testingcatalog.com/tiktok-rolled-
out-generative-avatars-feature-for-more-users-create-personalized-avatars-using-your-photos/
… -
TikTok introduces downloadable AI-generated avatars for profile use
By
–
These @tiktok_us generated avatars can be downloaded, selected as a profile picture and shared on stories
-
TikTok Expands Generative AI Avatar Feature to More Users
By
–
TikTok pushed its generative avatars feature to more users. There you can pick 10 photos of yourself to generate a bunch of avatars in different styles
-
Discussion on ChatGPT Plugins and Competitive AI Capabilities
By
–
Beta testing phase of ChatGPT plugins is coming. This is huge as Google Bard is still way behind on training / capabilities
-
Evaluating AI Tool Relevance and Accuracy for Content Creation
By
–
8/ Relevance and accuracy are crucial for content creators. A relevant AI response saves time by requiring less context, while accuracy ensures high-quality output. This comparison shows how AI tools can differ in these aspects.
-
Bing AI Evaluated as a Top Tool for Content Creators
By
–
7/ Bing AI (Powered by ChatGPT4): Impressive response with up-to-date info, thanks to its access to the Bing search index. Rating: #1. Its accurate and relevant information makes it the most valuable tool for content creators.
-
Evaluation of ChatGPT-4 performance and knowledge limitations
By
–
6/ ChatGPT-4: Gave a detailed response but relied on outdated information from its capped knowledge base. Rating: #2. Although it provided accurate info about beta testing, it didn't address the current state of TestingCatalog.
-
Performance Review and Accuracy Assessment of Google Bard
By
–
5/ Google Bard: Provided outdated info and made up some facts, which is not ideal. Rating: #3. It had some relevant details, but its inaccuracies can mislead content creators and waste their time.
-
Evaluating LLaMA-powered content analysis tool
By
–
4/ HuggingFace (Powered by LLaMA): Completely missed the mark and guessed what TestingCatalog might be about. Rating: #4. It didn't provide any relevant information, making it the least useful for content creators.