So basically an American AI company is standing between ‘cybergeddon’ and the Western world. This is why it is essential to get to AGI first, no matter what AOC and Sanders say. It is existential. It is also why the Pentagon and Anthropic dispute is dumb. And ultimately AI
@ninadschick
-
AI-Powered Cyber Defense: National Security Priorities
By
–
This is spot on, you need AI to patch the imperfect cyber-defences that are now ready to be exploited at scale by AI: "It would probably be ideal, for our national cyberdefense, if the federal government were not trying to destroy Anthropic and eliminate their models from
-
Government Interest in Claude Mythos: PLA and Pentagon Focus
By
–
Every Government in the world, but especially the People's Liberation Army and the Pentagon, are very interested in Claude Mythos.
-
Token costs for advanced AI model capability leap
By
–
Quite the leap in capability, how many tokens does it cost to run?!
-
AI Accessibility and Market Inequality: The Democratic Imperative
By
–
This will be essential; otherwise, only the 'rich' can afford to buy frontier intelligence in a market that is increasingly supply-constrained (giving them an asymmetric and compounding advantage)—and thereby fulfilling the anti-AI political platform. The only way AI 'wins' is
-
AI Public Backlash Turns Violent Amid Growing Opposition
By
–
Absolutely wild. A councilor's home shot, with 'no data centres' sign left behind. AI is losing the public perception war, VERY BADLY, and it's already becoming violent. The numbers: 1/ AI is less popular than ICE (NBC Poll) 2/ $162 billion in AI projects blocked or
-
AI Infrastructure Competition Intensifies Amid Geopolitical Rivalry
By
–
AI capability is accelerating at the same time geopolitical competition is intensifying.
— Nina Schick (@NinaDSchick) 7 avril 2026
That means bigger Intelligence factories. More capital. More competition to control the infrastructure that produces Intelligence.
Because in the 21st century, whoever can build, scale and… pic.twitter.com/bnU6c1p4cfAI capability is accelerating at the same time geopolitical competition is intensifying. That means bigger Intelligence factories. More capital. More competition to control the infrastructure that produces Intelligence. Because in the 21st century, whoever can build, scale and
-
AI Supply Constraints Drive Market Dynamics More Than Demand
By
–
The problem is supply, not demand.
-
Starving for Intelligence: Massive Compute Constraints Challenge
By
–
We are starving for Intelligence and we are still massively compute constrained.
-
OpenAI’s $121B compute spending sparks AI infrastructure crunch concerns
By
–
OpenAI projecting $121 billion in compute spending for AI research in 2028, with costs climbing to $125 billion annually by 2030.
— Nina Schick (@NinaDSchick) 6 avril 2026
All signs point to the coming compute crunch.
The AI companies with their own physical infrastructure, who create electricity generation as core… https://t.co/BVeTWb7rVbOpenAI projecting $121 billion in compute spending for AI research in 2028, with costs climbing to $125 billion annually by 2030. All signs point to the coming compute crunch. The AI companies with their own physical infrastructure, who create electricity generation as core