It claims to work. But the more of the face that’s covered, the less accurate. And as you must know, the hype/claims around these tech made by thirsty vendors far exceeds the tech’s real capabilities.
@mer__edith
-
Face Coverage Impacts Recognition Accuracy Reliability
By
–
Purported is the key word. The more of the face that’s covered the less accurate.
-
Reproducible Builds on Android: Apple Should Enable iOS Transparency
By
–
We have repro builds on Android. Apple doesn’t enable them for iOS (pressure them, bc they should) but you can decompile the binary.
-
Facial Recognition Systems Enable Targeted Harassment Campaigns
By
–
What smug fog do people live in? How is this a gotcha? They’re covering their faces bc today, in 2024, facial rec systems exist that can easily ID them, IDs that are then used by coordinated actors (trustees funding moving billboards, etc) to doxx/violently intimidate them.
-
Company’s ‘AI Curated’ Promise Sparks Major Backlash
By
–
“AI curated” is a real thing a company promised that I just about jumped out a building on hearing
-
AI is Marketing Term Redefined Each Decade
By
–
“AI” is a marketing term. It means what people selling tech under the term want it to mean in any given decade.
-
NSO-Style Device Hack: No Evidence Found Against Signal
By
–
We have seen no evidence. We assume, taking the claim at face value, that his device was hacked via an NSO-style targeted attack, which has nothing to do with Signal. But again, we have seen no evidence.
-
Telegram Privacy and Security Limitations Explained
By
–
No. Telegram is not private or secure, beyond one opt-in setting only for 1:1 chats.
-
Device Hacked via NSO-Style Targeted Attack: No Signal Evidence
By
–
We have seen no evidence. We assume, taking the claim at face value, that his device was hacked via an NSO-style targeted attack, which has nothing to do with Signal. But again, we have seen no evidence.