New open-source prompt engineering system coming later today 🙂
@mattshumer_
-
Dynamic Few-Shot Prompting: Finding the Similarity Sweet Spot
By
–
We started doing this back in 2020. At the time, we called it “dynamic few-shot” prompting. You have to be careful with this, though, because if the examples are too similar, sometimes the AI will overindex on them. There’s often a similarity sweet spot to find.
-
LLM Integration Overlooked in Product Development
By
–
You’d be surprised how many folks building LLMs into products don’t consider using them
-
Task-Dependent Prompt Engineering Effectiveness and Best Practices
By
–
Depends on the task — sometimes that will work (see claude-prompt-engineer). If not, even if it takes a little work, it's worth it!
-
Few-Shot Prompts Make Unexpected Comeback in 2026
By
–
Everyone is sleeping on few-shot prompts They're coming back, in a big way
-
Claude 3 Opus excels with high-quality prompt engineering examples
By
–
Claude 3 Opus + 10 examples is ridiculously capable. Just make sure the examples are super high-quality. Garbage in, garbage out.
-
Claude 3 Models Excel at Handling Multiple Examples
By
–
Newer models like Claude 3 are quite good at handling many examples gracefully
-
Multi-shot Prompting Set for Major Resurgence
By
–
Multi-shot prompting is going to come back, in a big way
-
Claude Opus 10-shot: Expensive and Slow Trade-offs
By
–
Haha thanks! And yeah 10-shot Opus is ridiculous, but expensive and slow
-
Comparing AI Solutions: Cost, Speed, and Quality Trade-offs
By
–
I don’t — if I did that, costs and latency would be through the roof. I’m more comparing these on a cost, speed, quality basis.