You don't apply for it actually. Instead, authors of selected papers are invited to present at ICLR, with the selection being based on recommendations by the AE and reviewers.
@hugo_larochelle
-
ICLR Partnership Continuation Announced
By
–
Thank you ICLR! Super glad that we'll be continuing this partnership!
-
Google AI Researcher Concludes Eight Year Montreal Lab Leadership
By
–
Today is my last day at Google. I started over 8 years ago, with a mandate to build a team doing bleeding edge AI research from Montreal, in what would be the first big tech AI research lab in the city. These years led to countless amazing scientific contributions from my team,
-
Burden of Proof: Is AI Really Conscious?
By
–
That's a great and fair question I think. My perspective right now is that the burden of proof is in the consciousness camp (since I think we all agree that a regular computer is not conscious) and there is not much to go by supporting consciousness in AI right now. However, the
-

Preventing Harms from Misbelief in AI Consciousness
By
–
Consciousness is a fascinating topic. But personally, I'd rather resources be directed towards preventing (human) harms coming from people mistakenly believing an AI system is conscious.
-
Epoch AI Episode Explores Thought-Provoking AI Development Forecasts
By
–
I'm late in finding this material, but I found this first episode of the Epoch AI quite interesting! It includes an impressive number of thought-provoking takes behind their forecast for the future development in AI. https://t.co/7u9r5fBkdG
— Hugo Larochelle (@hugo_larochelle) 3 avril 2025I'm late in finding this material, but I found this first episode of the Epoch AI quite interesting! It includes an impressive number of thought-provoking takes behind their forecast for the future development in AI.
-
Congratulations Liam on Your New AI Adventure
By
–
This is exciting! Congratulations for this new adventure Liam!
-
Automating AI Research: Progress and Human-AI Collaboration
By
–
Another interesting piece of work demonstrating progress towards automating AI research (around the same time as the recent @SakanaAILabs work). Part of the workflow required human confirmation, which they seem to want to reduce but I actually think could be embraced to achieve
-
Human Verification of Generative AI System Outputs
By
–
Well I think it's good practice for a real person to verify to output of generative AI systems so… I guess we'll mostly be… reviewing papers? 😉
-
Automating Reproducibility Reports for Existing Research Papers
By
–
How about applying to the automated production of reproducibility reports of existing papers? This should be easier than producing entirely new papers, and be quite useful in that this is a type of work that we probably don't do enough as a community.