Foxconn’s new factory. #nvidia pic.twitter.com/643Weu1TFc
— 🖤 Christine (@christinelu) 2 juin 2024
Foxconn’s new factory. #nvidia
By
–
Foxconn’s new factory. #nvidia pic.twitter.com/643Weu1TFc
— 🖤 Christine (@christinelu) 2 juin 2024
Foxconn’s new factory. #nvidia
By
–
Definitely would not be a good move to mandate that of kids for the same reason it would not be a good move for Xi to start a war in the region because no one wants to see a generation of their only children sent to die in a conflict.
By
–
English language Twitter is sharing articles by dude invited by Chinese company to travel to China and write puff piece on Chinese EVs and everyone sharing that like it’s not sponsored content.
By
–
It absolutely is. There are many Taiwanese actors and actresses that are opting out of that. The same for any other sector too. It’s a choice.
By
–
Yes. But that China market access is hard to give up for many. So that’s their choice.
By
–
Insecure authoritarian governments can weaponize access to its market for political leverage.
— 🖤 Christine (@christinelu) 11 mai 2024
But they don’t have to have a monopoly on Mandarin language content globally.
It’s possible to create content for Mandarin audiences without the pressure of one government while… pic.twitter.com/ffM9FxvvwC
Insecure authoritarian governments can weaponize access to its market for political leverage. But they don’t have to have a monopoly on Mandarin language content globally. It’s possible to create content for Mandarin audiences without the pressure of one government while
By
–
The “slippery slope” agreement conveniently allows for the focus to stay on the defense of free speech fixation without needing to address the defense of our democracy from a foreign adversary conversation I’m trying to have.

By
–
Rhetorical tweet.
— 🖤 Christine (@christinelu) 21 avril 2024
Why do “free speech” defenders equate forcing a foreign government to divest from a media platform with banning free speech?
It’s not about banning TikTok—it’s about protecting our democracy from external manipulation but that part keeps getting downplayed in… pic.twitter.com/87VSXPHWdh
Rhetorical tweet. Why do “free speech” defenders equate forcing a foreign government to divest from a media platform with banning free speech? It’s not about banning TikTok—it’s about protecting our democracy from external manipulation but that part keeps getting downplayed in
By
–
It’s so interesting how it listens like a podcast when it plays through. Even though it’s just threaded voice notes to each other with pretty accurate transcription. pic.twitter.com/RN3qSPtkTh
— 🖤 Christine (@christinelu) 20 avril 2024
It’s so interesting how it listens like a podcast when it plays through. Even though it’s just threaded voice notes to each other with pretty accurate transcription.