But that just means “i assume i can choose for anyone who isnt rational”
@andreasklinger
-
Rational Agents and Ethical Dilemmas in Decision Making
By
–
Bc my most nicest friends/family members wont be rational and just optimize for themselves. They will go with the outcome where nobody dies
-
Protecting Non-Rational Beings: An AI Ethics Thought Experiment
By
–
Imho thats the thought experiment. I assume some people who arent rational will be worth protecting
-
Political Coordination and Propaganda Impact on Collective Decision Making
By
–
If this would be done without coordination most people will vote blue b/c they dont want their nicest most naive family/friends/neighbours to die. If you can coordinate before you get political brainslop propaganda until its unclear what the outcome is.
-
Game Theory Strategy: Understanding Red Choice Decisions
By
–
Explain how picking red shows you understand game theory? And dont only include your outcome but also the outcome of your most beloved most naive most nicest family members
-
Framing shapes behavior prediction and decision outcomes
By
–
The framing is the question. Without the same framing you dont predict the same action by others
-
AI Safety Concerns: Protecting Vulnerable Populations from Risks
By
–
Or you dont want the nice naive people in your family and friendgroup to die
-
Half Your Family Will Die: AI Existential Risk Reality
By
–
But not everyone will. You accept that likely half your family will die. At least the nicest ones.
-
High trust societies and their role in AI development
By
–
What’s your opinion on “high trust” societies?
-
Game Theory Matrix: Second-Order Effects in Ethical Decision Making
By
–
Only if you don’t consider second effects into the matrix If you only consider your own outcome the matrix says be selfish
But that’s because you only added your own outcome to the matrix