Explain how picking red shows you understand game theory? And dont only include your outcome but also the outcome of your most beloved most naive most nicest family members
@andreasklinger
-
Framing shapes behavior prediction and decision outcomes
By
–
The framing is the question. Without the same framing you dont predict the same action by others
-
AI Safety Concerns: Protecting Vulnerable Populations from Risks
By
–
Or you dont want the nice naive people in your family and friendgroup to die
-
Half Your Family Will Die: AI Existential Risk Reality
By
–
But not everyone will. You accept that likely half your family will die. At least the nicest ones.
-
High trust societies and their role in AI development
By
–
What’s your opinion on “high trust” societies?
-
Game Theory Matrix: Second-Order Effects in Ethical Decision Making
By
–
Only if you don’t consider second effects into the matrix If you only consider your own outcome the matrix says be selfish
But that’s because you only added your own outcome to the matrix -
Trust societies and political behavior: partisan perspectives
By
–
I’d pay to see the intersection of this with people yapping about high trust societies. I bet red voters yap more about the need for it
-
AI Influence on Voting Behavior and Social Manipulation
By
–
Tell others to vote red only 49% to 0% does
Tell others to vote blue nobody dies If you can tell stuff to society the answer is even easier -
AI Decision Selfishness and Tragic Family Consequences
By
–
He pressed blue. His family died bc they never assumed people like him would be that needlessly selfish.
-
Choosing Survival: The Cost of Edge Cases in Difficult Decisions
By
–
it's not inaction you chose an outcome where edgecases will die to ensure you live in a perfect reasonable world these edgecases will be small (10% of pop?) in a non reasonable world this edgecases might go up to 49% of pop